| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2009 Chrysler PT Cruiser and 2016 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2009 | 2016 | |
| Model | Chrysler PT Cruiser | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Wagon | 2dr Convertible | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,616 mm | 2,720 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,290 mm | 4,783 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,704 mm | 1,915 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,656 mm | 1,394 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,427 kg | 1,653 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 57 L | 61 L | -4 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 996 mm | 955 mm | 41 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,367 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,273 mm | 1,394 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,031 mm | 1,067 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,003 mm | 907 mm | -906 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,361 mm | 1,135 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,186 mm | 1,110 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,039 mm | 782 mm | -781 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,070 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,849 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 612 L | 323 L | 289 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,818 L | 11.4 | -10.4 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Chrysler PT Cruiser
| 2009 Chrysler PT Cruiser Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Wagon 150-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
The PT Cruiser is surprisingly roomy in the back seat, in terms of legroom and headroom. The backrest angle though is a bit too upright for full comfort. see full Chrysler PT Cruiser review |
| 2008 | 4dr Wagon 150-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
I have a bad leg ,the high seat ,wide door opening and extra leg make it easy for me to swing my leg in and out. It has more room than lots of other cars. see full Chrysler PT Cruiser review |
| 2008 | 2dr Convertible turbocharged 180hp 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
Can seat 2 adults comfortably. Plenty of leg room and visibility. see full Chrysler PT Cruiser review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
| 2016 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang.
See TrueDelta's information for all Wagons and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Chrysler models.
