| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2009 Dodge Dakota and 2013 Volkswagen Eos Specifications
| Model Year | 2009 | 2013 | |
| Model | Dodge Dakota | Volkswagen Eos | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Dodge Dakota
| 2009 Dodge Dakota Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Crew Cab 5.5ft bed 302-horsepower 4.7L V8 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
Cheap, cramped and very uncomfortable. see full Dodge Dakota review |
| 2010 | 4dr Crew Cab 5.5ft bed 302-horsepower 4.7L V8 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
Passengers noticed very cramped in comparison to the Ridgleine see full Dodge Dakota review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Volkswagen Eos
| 2013 Volkswagen Eos Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual FWD |
The back seat is not comfortable and has limited leg room. While the latter may be typical of some convertibles, leg room is less than on previous convertibles I have owned. see full Volkswagen Eos review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Pickups
See TrueDelta's information for all Dodge models.
