Ford C-MAX vs. Buick Rendezvous MPG

Chart is based on 179 fuel economy reports for the Ford C-MAX and 33 fuel economy reports for the Buick Rendezvous.

Ford C-MAX MPG

Year	Body/Powertrain	flat, hilly, or mountainousLand	driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot	A/C use: none to heavyA/C	constant stop and goTraf %	many stops per mileCity %	stop every mile or twoSub %	fairly steady speedHwy %	Hwy Spd	MPG
2017	4dr Hatch 141-horsepower 2.0L I4 Hybrid CVT FWD	flat	light	none	0	0	53	47	69	34.8
2015	4dr Hatch 141-horsepower 2.0L I4 Hybrid CVT FWD	flat	light	light	24	37	21	19	66	44.4
2014	4dr Hatch 141-horsepower 2.0L I4 Plug-in Hybrid CVT FWD	flat	light	none	0	20	30	50	65	72.2
2013	4dr Hatch 141-horsepower 2.0L I4 Plug-in Hybrid CVT FWD	flat	light	light	17	21	42	21	70	63.0
2013	4dr Hatch 141-horsepower 2.0L I4 Hybrid CVT FWD	flat	light	light	1	18	35	46	63	43.1

This page shows only averages. See all the Ford C-MAX fuel economy data.

Year	Body/Powertrain	flat, hilly, or mountainousLand	driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot	A/C use: none to heavyA/C	constant stop and goTraf %	many stops per mileCity %	stop every mile or twoSub %	fairly steady speedHwy %	Hwy Spd	MPG
2007	4dr SUV 195-horsepower 3.5L V6 4-speed automatic FWD	flat	light	light	1	39	26	34	68	21.9
2006	4dr SUV 195-horsepower 3.5L V6 4-speed automatic AWD	flat	light	none	7	24	10	58	87	18.6
2005	4dr SUV 242-horsepower 3.6L V6 4-speed automatic AWD	flat	light	light	43	4	9	45	65	19.0
2005	4dr SUV 185-horsepower 3.4L V6 4-speed automatic FWD	flat	light	light	8	18	15	60	71	22.7
2005	4dr SUV 185-horsepower 3.4L V6 4-speed automatic AWD	flat	light	none	0	40	50	10	60	18.2
2004	4dr SUV 185-horsepower 3.4L V6 4-speed automatic AWD	flat	med	light	1	11	20	68	71	20.5
2003	4dr SUV 185-horsepower 3.4L V6 4-speed automatic FWD	flat	med	light	18	10	18	55	83	19.3
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2003	4dr SUV 185-horsepower 3.4L V6 4-speed automatic AWD	flat	med	light	13	30	25	33	60	16.8
2002	4dr SUV 185-horsepower 3.4L V6 4-speed automatic AWD	flat	light	light	10	10	10	70	60	20.0

This page shows only averages. See all the Buick Rendezvous fuel economy data.

See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks

See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models and Buick models.

Ford C-MAX Real Gas Mileage: Pros
Year	Comment
2013	The Ford C-MAX's fuel economy is at once the #1 reason most people will buy a C-MAX, but also the model's greatest shortfall. The EPA ratings are an impressive 47 mpg city, 47 highway. In real suburban driving we (and many owners) observed trip computer averages of 33 to 40, with an overall average of 35.8. Go easy on the gas and initiate braking early enough to fully recoup kinetic energy, and low to mid 40s can happen. But 47 is a stretch. There are two ways to look at this. On the one hand, the C-MAX isn't coming close to its EPA ratings. Odds are Ford will have to make an adjustment and credit past buyers for the difference, Hyundai-Kia style. (Which actually might be a reason to buy one before this happens.) On the other hand, even 36 mpg is about 8-12 miles-per-gallon better than similarly functional non-hybrid vehicles, including the related Ford Escape. Efficiency is supported by excellent, highly configurable instrumentation. I personally opted to view a tach (rare in a hybrid), driving style ratings, and average mpg. A "brake coach" lets you know after each stop what percentage of kinetic energy was regenerated. In hybrids, this has a large impact on mpg than how hard you accelerate (more on this below). The C-MAX is also offered as an "Energi" Plug-in Hybrid rated to cruise 21 miles on electricity alone. see full Ford C-MAX review

Ford C-MAX Real Gas Mileage: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2013	4dr Hatch 141-horsepower 2.0L I4 Hybrid CVT FWD	With some care, it is not too hard to surpass the revised EPA estimates of 44 city / 39 highway. It particulary shines in city and suburban driving where you can crest 50 mpg on some short trips. In mixed driving, we match the EPA estimate of 40 MPG without paying much attention. While not as great as the Prius, this efficiency was certainly a step up for us and the difference in fuel costs over a year between the C-Max and Prius was not worth the shortcomings we found in the Prius (particularly poor handling and uncomfortable seats). see full Ford C-MAX review

Ford C-MAX Real Gas Mileage: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2013	4dr Hatch 141-horsepower 2.0L I4 Hybrid CVT FWD	On the down side for fuel economy, cold weather does a number on the MPG as is reported with other hybrid. On short trips (4 miles or less) on a cold start in cold weather with the heater going, expect low 20s for your MPG. This is mitigated over longer trips once the engine has warmed up, but we still get 1-3 MPG under our usual in cold weather for longer trips. see full Ford C-MAX review

Buick Rendezvous Real Gas Mileage: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2005	4dr SUV 185-horsepower 3.4L V6 4-speed automatic FWD	Generally good mileage. I generally have a light to medium foot, will use A/C, and most driving is a mix of suburb and hwy. Tend to get just over 20mpg. On strict highway driving with a load, get 23 plus. see full Buick Rendezvous review

Buick Rendezvous Real Gas Mileage: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2002	4dr SUV 185-horsepower 3.4L V6 4-speed automatic FWD	poor fuel economy see full Buick Rendezvous review