| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Ford C-MAX and 2012 Dodge Durango Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2012 | |
| Model | Ford C-MAX | Dodge Durango | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,649 mm | 3,043 mm | -1 mm |
| Length | 4,409 mm | 5,075 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,829 mm | 1,925 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,623 mm | 1,801 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,636 kg | 2,157 kg | -1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 51 L | 93 L | -42 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,041 mm | 1,013 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,420 mm | 1,486 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,379 mm | 1,448 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,026 mm | 1,024 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,001 mm | 1,011 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,402 mm | 1,481 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,318 mm | 1,422 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 927 mm | 980 mm | -53 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 960 mm | -960 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,280 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,087 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 800 mm | -800 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,953 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,804 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 694 L | 487 L | 207 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 24.5 | 1,351 L | 23.5 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,489 L | 2,393 L | -1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford C-MAX
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford C-MAX.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Dodge Durango
| 2012 Dodge Durango Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV 290-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
There was very little bolstering on the sides of the seat bottoms. I was not able to find a comfortable seating position in the Durango see full Dodge Durango review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
