| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2009 Ford Escape and 2015 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2009 | 2015 | |
| Model | Ford Escape | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 103.1 in | 107.1 in | -4 in |
| Length | 174.7 in | 188.3 in | -13.6 in |
| Width | 71.1 in | 75.4 in | -4.3 in |
| Height | 67.7 in | 54.4 in | 13.3 in |
| Curb Weight | 3254 lb. | 3526 lb. | -272 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.5 gal. | 16.0 gal. | 0.5 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.4 in | 37.6 in | 2.8 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.6 in | 56.3 in | 0.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 53.3 in | 54.9 in | -1.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.6 in | 42.0 in | -0.4 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.2 in | 34.8 in | 4.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 55.9 in | 52.2 in | 3.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 49.1 in | 47.4 in | 1.7 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 35.6 in | 30.6 in | 5 in |
| Total Legroom | 77.2 in (over 2 rows) | 72.6 in (over 2 rows) | 4.6 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 29.2 ft3 | 13.5 ft3 | 15.7 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 66.3 ft3 | 13.5 ft3 | 52.8 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Ford Escape
| 2009 Ford Escape Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 171-horsepower 2.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
Surprisingly large back seat - roomier than the Explorer see full Ford Escape review |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 171-horsepower 2.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
Plenty of room - includes armrests see full Ford Escape review |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 200-horsepower 3.0L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Enough room for my elderly Dad to sit there comfortably, unlike the back seat of the Subaru Forester which was my original first choice. see full Ford Escape review |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 200-horsepower 3.0L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Even with front seat a bit forward to allow for rear seat passenger, plenty of room in the front. see full Ford Escape review |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 200-horsepower 3.0L V6 4-speed automatic AWD |
plenty of room see full Ford Escape review |
| 2009 Ford Escape Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 153-horsepower 2.3L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
Front seat was really hard. My backside was sore right away. see full Ford Escape review |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 200-horsepower 3.0L V6 4-speed automatic AWD |
The leather seats are hard. Has a cheap plastic feel. see full Ford Escape review |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 200-horsepower 3.0L V6 4-speed automatic AWD |
The leather seats are the same in the back. Has a hard plastic feel. Suppose to be leather . see full Ford Escape review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang
| 2015 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
