| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Ford Escape and 2015 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2015 | |
| Model | Ford Escape | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 103.1 in | 107.1 in | -4 in |
| Length | 174.7 in | 188.3 in | -13.6 in |
| Width | 71.1 in | 75.4 in | -4.3 in |
| Height | 67.7 in | 54.4 in | 13.3 in |
| Curb Weight | 3254 lb. | 3526 lb. | -272 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.5 gal. | 16.0 gal. | 0.5 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.4 in | 37.6 in | 2.8 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.6 in | 56.3 in | 0.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 53.3 in | 54.9 in | -1.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.6 in | 42.0 in | -0.4 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.2 in | 34.8 in | 4.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 55.9 in | 52.2 in | 3.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 49.1 in | 47.4 in | 1.7 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 35.6 in | 30.6 in | 5 in |
| Total Legroom | 77.2 in (over 2 rows) | 72.6 in (over 2 rows) | 4.6 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 29.2 ft3 | 13.5 ft3 | 15.7 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 66.3 ft3 | 13.5 ft3 | 52.8 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Ford Escape
| 2011 Ford Escape Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 171-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed automatic FWD |
Wide bench seat with no humps. Middle passenger has good leg room where many other vehicles have a large hump to straddle. see full Ford Escape review |
| 2011 Ford Escape Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV 171-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed automatic FWD |
It's a tad bit tight in the drivers seat. I have to postion the seat just right to avoid hitting my right knee on the center console, and I frequently hit the light switch when getting out. I'm only 5'9", so not that large of a person. see full Ford Escape review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang
| 2015 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
