Model Year | 2011 | 2017 | |
Model | Ford Expedition | Chevrolet SS | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 3,023 mm | 2,916 mm | 1 mm |
Length | 5,245 mm | 4,966 mm | 1 mm |
Width | 2,002 mm | 1,897 mm | 1 mm |
Height | 1,961 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 2,530 kg | 1,813 kg | 1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 106 L | 71 L | 35 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,006 mm | 983 mm | -982 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,605 mm | 1,501 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,529 mm | 1,453 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,044 mm | 1,074 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 1,011 mm | 965 mm | -964 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,618 mm | 1,499 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,521 mm | 1,473 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 993 mm | 1,008 mm | 992 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 973 mm | 0 mm | 973 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,318 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,275 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 958 mm | 0 mm | 958 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,995 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,083 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 527 L | 464 L | 63 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,557 L | 16.4 | -15.4 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 3,067 L | 16.4 | -13.4 L |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2011 Ford Expedition.
2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is functional and roomy. I'm 6'4" and with the drivers seat in my preferred postion there is still a decent amount of legroom behind. Overall much better than the Charger/Challenger. see full Chevrolet SS review |
2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
The front seat is just OK. Feels like a pretty flat bottom and fairly hard. Also, for a car with sporting pretentions there is surprisingly little side bolstering. see full Chevrolet SS review |