Ford Focus (2012) vs. Ford Ranger (2006) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2012 Ford Focus and 2006 Ford Ranger specs .
2012 Ford Focus and 2006 Ford Ranger Specifications
Model Year
2012
2006
Model
Ford Focus
Ford Ranger
Engine
Transmission
Drivetrain
Body
Difference
Total Legroom
0 in (over 1 rows)
0 in (over 1 rows)
0 in
Return to top
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Ford Focus
2012 Ford Focus Seat Room and Comfort: Cons Year Comment
Like other recently designed Fords, the Focus has a tighter rear seat than most competitors. At 5-9, I can sit behind myself with perhaps an inch to spare.
see full Ford Focus review
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Ford Focus
2012 Ford Focus Seat Room and Comfort: Cons Year Body/Powertrain Comment
2012 4dr Hatch 160-horsepower 2.0L I4
Driver seat cushion very uncomfortable after 30 minutes; feels like no cushion in seat
see full Ford Focus review
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Ford Ranger
2006 Ford Ranger Seat Room and Comfort: Cons Year Body/Powertrain Comment
2007 2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 148-horsepower 3.0L V6
The rear jump seats are suitable only for children.
see full Ford Ranger review 2005 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
Rear compartment of Ranger extended cab is smaller and has side-facing jumpseats.
see full Ford Ranger review
See TrueDelta's information for all
Sedans ,
Coupes ,
Hatchbacks , and
Wagons .
See TrueDelta's information for all
Ford models .
