| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Ford Focus and 2014 GMC Terrain Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2014 | |
| Model | Ford Focus | GMC Terrain | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 102.9 in | 112.5 in | -9.6 in |
| Length | 175.0 in | 185.3 in | -10.3 in |
| Width | 66.7 in | 72.8 in | -6.1 in |
| Height | 58.6 in | 66.3 in | -7.7 in |
| Curb Weight | 2623 lb. | 3853 lb. | -1230 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 13.5 gal. | 18.8 gal. | -5.3 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 39.2 in | 39.8 in | -0.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 53.5 in | 55.7 in | -2.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 50.4 in | 55.1 in | -4.7 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.7 in | 41.2 in | 0.5 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 38.3 in | 39.2 in | -0.9 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 53.7 in | 55.3 in | -1.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 50.9 in | 51.3 in | -0.4 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 36.1 in | 39.9 in | -3.8 in |
| Total Legroom | 77.8 in (over 2 rows) | 81.1 in (over 2 rows) | -3.3 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 13.8 ft3 | 31.6 ft3 | -17.8 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.8 ft3 | 63.9 ft3 | -50.1 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Ford Focus
| 2011 Ford Focus Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2010 | The rear seat is fairly comfortable--if you fit. Many compacts have roomier back seats. see full Ford Focus review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Ford Focus
| 2011 Ford Focus Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 140-horsepower 2.0L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
I am ranking the driver's seat high in comfort even though 10 minutes is not enough to be sure. The seat has a lot of adjustability, including height. It feels like sitting on a platform rather than a hammock. The seat felt supportive without being hard. I can imagine it would allow for long distance travel in comfort. see full Ford Focus review |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 140-horsepower 2.0L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
Head room was great and the seat adjusted vertically with an easy to use lever. see full Ford Focus review |
| 2011 Ford Focus Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr Hatch 160-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual FWD |
Driver seat cushion very uncomfortable after 30 minutes; feels like no cushion in seat see full Ford Focus review |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 140-horsepower 2.0L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
It's tight in the back. Entry and egress are a bit cumbersome in particular for the feet. My shoe size is 9.5. see full Ford Focus review |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 140-horsepower 2.0L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
Like sitting on concrete. One minor positive was that the lumbar support was decent, but overall lacking in comfort. see full Ford Focus review |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 140-horsepower 2.0L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
Air conditioner doesn't cool car. see full Ford Focus review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 GMC Terrain
| 2014 GMC Terrain Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2013 | The GMC Terrain's long wheelbase also pays off with noticeably more rear seat leg room than in competitors. In fact, there's a little more combined legroom in the first two rows than in the far larger Yukon XL, and a few more inches than in the larger Acadia. Sound like enough space to fit a third row? Perhaps, but GM opted not to offer one. The Terrain is thoroughly compact in width. The larger GMCs remain much better options for transporting three adults in the back seat. They're also better for carrying cargo. The Terrain's cargo floor is long, but its also high and narrow, and the second-row seats don't fold flat. see full GMC Terrain review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 GMC Terrain
| 2014 GMC Terrain Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2015 | 4dr SUV 301-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The rear seat room is plentiful, and because rear seat can be slid forward and back, you can shift between needing more leg room and using more of the cargo area. We had traded in a 2015 Dodge Journey for the Terrain, because of safety concerns, but realized after we had it for awhile, the rear seat of the Journey was not able to go back far enough into the cargo area, and because of the bulky and high mounted head rests, you felt trapped. The Terrain does not have these issues and feels much more roomy and comfortable. The rear seats are supportive and not at all like some back seats that feel like they were an afterthought. see full GMC Terrain review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
