| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2013 Ford Focus and 2010 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Specifications
| Model Year | 2013 | 2010 | |
| Model | Ford Focus | Mercedes-Benz C-Class | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 104.3 in | 108.7 in | -4.4 in |
| Length | 178.5 in | 182.3 in | -3.8 in |
| Width | 71.8 in | 69.7 in | 2.1 in |
| Height | 57.7 in | 56.3 in | 1.4 in |
| Curb Weight | 2907 lb. | 3527 lb. | -620 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 12.4 gal. | 17.4 gal. | -5 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.3 in | 37.1 in | 1.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 55.6 in | 54.7 in | 0.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 53.9 in | 52.3 in | 1.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.9 in | 41.7 in | 0.2 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 38.0 in | 36.9 in | 1.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 53.7 in | 55.1 in | -1.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 52.7 in | 54.9 in | -2.2 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 33.2 in | 33.4 in | -0.2 in |
| Total Legroom | 75.1 in (over 2 rows) | 75.1 in (over 2 rows) | 0 in |
| Cargo Volume | 13.2 ft3 | 12.4 ft3 | 0.8 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford Focus
| 2013 Ford Focus Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Like other recently designed Fords, the Focus has a tighter rear seat than most competitors. At 5-9, I can sit behind myself with perhaps an inch to spare. see full Ford Focus review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford Focus
| 2013 Ford Focus Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2014 | 4dr Sedan 103-horsepower 1.6L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The front passenger seat is cramped, especially on long journeys. My wife is smaller, so its fine for her, but Im an average sized male, about 5'11" and my left knee always aches after a while. see full Ford Focus review |
| 2012 | 4dr Hatch 160-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual FWD |
Driver seat cushion very uncomfortable after 30 minutes; feels like no cushion in seat see full Ford Focus review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Mercedes-Benz C-Class
| 2010 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
This car has a very small back seat. If you want to carry passengers for a long distance, get an E class. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 228-horsepower 3.0L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
The seat causes no discomfort to my tailbone like many ohter cars. Furthermore, the padding is firm and feels like it will last a long time. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 228-horsepower 3.0L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Mercedes-Benz makes the best seats in the business, period. Even after a 10 hour drive, my back did not hurt. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2010 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan supercharged 181hp 1.8L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Not much leg room when compared to other luxury entries. No flat floor so a 3rd passenger in the rear is not possible. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan supercharged 181hp 1.8L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Center console and stack cut into front side leg room, my left leg is always up against the center console. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
