| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2013 Ford Mustang and 2010 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Specifications
| Model Year | 2013 | 2010 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Mercedes-Benz C-Class | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 107.1 in | 108.7 in | -1.6 in |
| Length | 188.5 in | 182.3 in | 6.2 in |
| Width | 73.9 in | 69.7 in | 4.2 in |
| Height | 55.8 in | 56.3 in | -0.5 in |
| Curb Weight | 3501 lb. | 3527 lb. | -26 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.0 gal. | 17.4 gal. | -1.4 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.5 in | 37.1 in | 1.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 55.3 in | 54.7 in | 0.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 53.4 in | 52.3 in | 1.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.4 in | 41.7 in | 0.7 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 34.7 in | 36.9 in | -2.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 47.8 in | 55.1 in | -7.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 46.8 in | 54.9 in | -8.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 29.8 in | 33.4 in | -3.6 in |
| Total Legroom | 72.2 in (over 2 rows) | 75.1 in (over 2 rows) | -2.9 in |
| Cargo Volume | 13.4 ft3 | 12.4 ft3 | 1 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford Mustang
| 2013 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2013 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 2dr Coupe 305-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
My dad's 2010 Camaro has much more legroom than my Mustang. 2 more inches would help a lot, though I have to admit even at 6-3, I'm still pretty comfy in the Mustang. The room would be nice to have on trips. see full Ford Mustang review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Mercedes-Benz C-Class
| 2010 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
This car has a very small back seat. If you want to carry passengers for a long distance, get an E class. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 228-horsepower 3.0L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
The seat causes no discomfort to my tailbone like many ohter cars. Furthermore, the padding is firm and feels like it will last a long time. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 228-horsepower 3.0L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Mercedes-Benz makes the best seats in the business, period. Even after a 10 hour drive, my back did not hurt. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2010 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan supercharged 181hp 1.8L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Not much leg room when compared to other luxury entries. No flat floor so a 3rd passenger in the rear is not possible. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan supercharged 181hp 1.8L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Center console and stack cut into front side leg room, my left leg is always up against the center console. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
