| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Ford Mustang and 2012 BMW X3 Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2012 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | BMW X3 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 107.1 in | 110.6 in | -3.5 in |
| Length | 188.3 in | 183.0 in | 5.3 in |
| Width | 75.4 in | 74.1 in | 1.3 in |
| Height | 54.4 in | 65.4 in | -11 in |
| Curb Weight | 3526 lb. | 4112 lb. | -586 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.0 gal. | 17.7 gal. | -1.7 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 37.6 in | 40.7 in | -3.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.3 in | 57.3 in | -1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 54.9 in | 0.0 in | 54.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.0 in | 39.9 in | 2.1 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 34.8 in | 39.1 in | -4.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 52.2 in | 56.0 in | -3.8 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 47.4 in | 0.0 in | 47.4 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 30.6 in | 36.8 in | -6.2 in |
| Total Legroom | 72.6 in (over 2 rows) | 76.7 in (over 2 rows) | -4.1 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 13.5 ft3 | 27.6 ft3 | -14.1 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.5 ft3 | 63.3 ft3 | -49.8 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
| 2016 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 BMW X3
| 2012 BMW X3 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2013 | Thanks partly to power-adjustable side bolsters, the X3's optional sport seats are both supportive and comfortable. They're firm where you want them to be firm, yet (unlike those in the Audi and Mercedes-Benz) cushy where you want them to be cushy. The Volvo XC60's seats are also very comfortable, but can't quite match the BMW's lateral support. You sit substantially higher than in a BMW sedan, both relative to the ground and to the instrument panel. The windshield is more distant than in the original X3, making the current one seem considerably larger, but it remains more upright than in most recently designed crossovers. The forward visibility many people buy a crossover to get can be gotten here. Rear seat legroom increased by an inch with the 2011 redesign, and is now competitive. A couple of adults will fit, so there's no compelling functional reason to step up to the X5 unless you require tall people to be comfortable back there. see full BMW X3 review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 BMW X3
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2012 BMW X3.
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
