| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2015 Ford Mustang and 2012 Chevrolet Equinox Specifications
| Model Year | 2015 | 2012 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Chevrolet Equinox | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 107.1 in | 112.5 in | -5.4 in |
| Length | 188.3 in | 187.8 in | 0.5 in |
| Width | 75.4 in | 72.5 in | 2.9 in |
| Height | 54.4 in | 66.3 in | -11.9 in |
| Curb Weight | 3526 lb. | 3761 lb. | -235 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.0 gal. | 18.8 gal. | -2.8 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 37.6 in | 40.9 in | -3.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.3 in | 55.8 in | 0.5 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 54.9 in | 54.6 in | 0.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.0 in | 41.2 in | 0.8 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 34.8 in | 39.2 in | -4.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 52.2 in | 55.3 in | -3.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 47.4 in | 51.1 in | -3.7 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 30.6 in | 39.9 in | -9.3 in |
| Total Legroom | 72.6 in (over 2 rows) | 81.1 in (over 2 rows) | -8.5 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 13.5 ft3 | 31.5 ft3 | -18 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.5 ft3 | 63.7 ft3 | -50.2 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang
| 2015 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Chevrolet Equinox
| 2012 Chevrolet Equinox Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 182-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Just might be enough for a 7 footer. see full Chevrolet Equinox review |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 182-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
It gets more comfortable the more I drive and I do take long drives at times see full Chevrolet Equinox review |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 182-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
I have two children and they can ride back there comfortablely see full Chevrolet Equinox review |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 182-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Rear seat slides 8" forward and back. In the back position, excellent leg room for adults. When slid forward, good rear cargo room. see full Chevrolet Equinox review |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 182-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Great - lots of leg room and very adjustable see full Chevrolet Equinox review |
| 2012 Chevrolet Equinox Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 182-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Front seats are not very supportive, and you sink down into them see full Chevrolet Equinox review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
