| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2013 Ford Mustang and 2013 Chevrolet Malibu Specifications
| Model Year | 2013 | 2013 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Chevrolet Malibu | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 107.1 in | 107.8 in | -0.7 in |
| Length | 188.5 in | 191.5 in | -3 in |
| Width | 73.9 in | 73.0 in | 0.9 in |
| Height | 55.8 in | 57.6 in | -1.8 in |
| Curb Weight | 3501 lb. | 3393 lb. | 108 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.0 gal. | 18.5 gal. | -2.5 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.5 in | 39.0 in | -0.5 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 55.3 in | 57.5 in | -2.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 53.4 in | 55.0 in | -1.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.4 in | 42.1 in | 0.3 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 34.7 in | 37.5 in | -2.8 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 47.8 in | 57.1 in | -9.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 46.8 in | 54.3 in | -7.5 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 29.8 in | 36.8 in | -7 in |
| Total Legroom | 72.2 in (over 2 rows) | 78.9 in (over 2 rows) | -6.7 in |
| Cargo Volume | 13.4 ft3 | 16.3 ft3 | -2.9 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford Mustang
| 2013 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2013 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 2dr Coupe 305-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
My dad's 2010 Camaro has much more legroom than my Mustang. 2 more inches would help a lot, though I have to admit even at 6-3, I'm still pretty comfy in the Mustang. The room would be nice to have on trips. see full Ford Mustang review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Chevrolet Malibu
| 2013 Chevrolet Malibu Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2012 | On paper, the Malibu's rear seat is only a little tighter than those in the 2008-2012 sedan and in competing cars. In person, rear knee room would only be marginally competitive in the compact sedan segment. Sitting behind my 5-9 self, my shins graze the front seatbacks. GM is rushing some revised seats to market. But if past attempts to fix a cramped rear seat are any indication, this won't make a substantial difference. The rear seat in the Ford Fusion is roomier, if also short of the segment's quasi-limos. see full Chevrolet Malibu review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Chevrolet Malibu
| 2013 Chevrolet Malibu Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2014 | 4dr Sedan 196-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Both front & rear compartments very roomy & comfortable. Again, this is noted improvement over our 2009 Malibu. see full Chevrolet Malibu review |
| 2013 Chevrolet Malibu Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Sedan 182-horsepower 2.4L I4 Hybrid 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
This is tight if front seats are postioned at or close to the back of their range; shorter wheelbase in this model compared to prior version. Rear seat access is excellent (i.e, for infant car seats, small item transport). see full Chevrolet Malibu review |
| 2012 | 4dr Sedan 169-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
I'm 6'4" tall and 60 years old. I have a tough time getting in and out due to the low roof. see full Chevrolet Malibu review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
