| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Ford Mustang and 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2016 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,720 mm | 2,946 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,778 mm | 5,182 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,877 mm | 2,045 mm | -1 mm |
| Height | 1,412 mm | 1,890 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,543 kg | 2,479 kg | -1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 98 L | -37 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 978 mm | 1,087 mm | 977 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,405 mm | 1,646 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,356 mm | 1,544 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,151 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 881 mm | 983 mm | -102 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,311 mm | 1,654 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,189 mm | 1,532 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 757 mm | 991 mm | -234 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 968 mm | -968 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,590 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,252 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 630 mm | -630 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,834 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,771 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 379 L | 433 L | -54 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 13.4 | 1,461 L | 12.4 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.4 | 2,682 L | 11.4 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Ford Mustang
| 2010 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
Very confortable seats, The stock seats hold you pretty well even in a little senmi-agressing driving. Nice position in the power seats and easy to get the just right spot. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2010 | 2dr Convertible 315-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
The adjustability of the power seat. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2009 | 2dr Coupe 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed manual RWD |
Perfect seating position for both of us. Nice cush for your tush see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2010 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 2dr Coupe 305-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
Felt like seating position was "on the floor". Steering wheel had only tilt adjustment, no telescope. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2010 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
What rear seat room? see full Ford Mustang review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
| 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | Some (perhaps more than some) people are drawn to large SUVs because they like to feel like the king of the road when behind the wheel. Others need a lot of space while driving, or at least feel they do. Few vehicles have more front seat room than the new Tahoe. With an inch-and-a-half less shoulder room, the Ford's front-row dimensions aren't quite as generous, and its taller, shifter-festooned console is more intrusive. The front seats are comfortable in both. The Expedition's are a little wider and softer, and they're upholstered with especially rich hides in the King Ranch and Platinum (vs. the most recently tested and photographed Limited). Whether this is preferable is a matter of taste. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review | |
| 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Both the Tahoe and Expedition have roomy, comfortable second-row seats, with a slight edge to the higher cushions in the Chevrolet. Bonus points to the Tahoe for automatic rear climate controls (they're manual in the Expedition). Move to the third-row seat, and you'll wonder why, despite redesigns for 2007 and 2015, General Motors has stubbornly refused to follow Ford's 2003 switch from a solid rear axle to an independent rear suspension. With a solid axle, the rear floor must be high to permit the rear differential to travel up and down when a wheel hits a bump. Consequently, the Tahoe's third row seat must be very thinly constructed and mounted very close to the floor. Even pre-teen children won't be comfortable in it. In sharp contrast, the Expedition's third-row seat is higher off the floor than its second-row seat, much less the ridiculously low third row in the Tahoe, and is--surprise--considerably more comfortable as a result. The Suburban's third-row seat is roomier than the Tahoe's but still far inferior to the Expedition's. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban.
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
