| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2020 Ford Mustang and 2013 Dodge Durango Specifications
| Model Year | 2020 | 2013 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Dodge Durango | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,720 mm | 3,043 mm | -1 mm |
| Length | 4,788 mm | 5,075 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,915 mm | 1,925 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,379 mm | 1,801 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,607 kg | 2,157 kg | -1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 59 L | 93 L | -34 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 955 mm | 1,013 mm | 954 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,430 mm | 1,486 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,394 mm | 1,448 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,085 mm | 1,024 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 884 mm | 1,011 mm | 883 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,326 mm | 1,481 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,204 mm | 1,422 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 737 mm | 980 mm | -243 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 960 mm | -960 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,280 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,087 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 800 mm | -800 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,821 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,804 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 382 L | 487 L | -105 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 13.5 | 1,351 L | 12.5 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.5 | 2,393 L | 11.5 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2020 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2020 Ford Mustang.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Dodge Durango
| 2013 Dodge Durango Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2014 | The Durango's relatively narrow width, a plus for handling, has the opposite impact on interior room. These are very much two sides of the same coin. Because the Durango's cabin isn't terribly wide it feels more agile than wider SUVs. But three passengers in the second row don't have as much space to spread out--those in a Nissan Pathfinder enjoy a couple more inches of shoulder room--and only two people can sit in the third row. (The Honda Pilot, Toyota Highlander, and GM's large crossovers all have three belts back there.) Leg room in the Durango is much more competitive, but still a few inches short of class leading. This said, comfort isn't only a matter of interior dimensions. Both of the Durango's rear rows are well-upholstered and positioned higher off the floor than the three-row crossover norm. This benefits both thigh support and outward visibility. The Hyundai Santa Fe isn't far off in this regard, but the Nissan Pathfinder's seats are much closer to the floor, and less hospitable to adults as a result. Among the three, I'd prefer to be a rear seat passenger in the Dodge. Among large conventional SUVs, the Ford Expedition has a more comfortable third row, but the Chevrolet Tahoe (which retains a live rear axle despite a comprehensive redesign for the 2015 model year) doesn't come close. And the foot-shorter 4Runner? Its XXS third-row seat is best saved for emergencies. On the other side of the ledger, the Durango does have a higher floor than the typical car-based crossover. Getting in and out isn't as easy. This vies with curb weight as the top disadvantage of the Durango's conventional SUV configuration. see full Dodge Durango review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Dodge Durango
| 2013 Dodge Durango Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV 290-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
There was very little bolstering on the sides of the seat bottoms. I was not able to find a comfortable seating position in the Durango see full Dodge Durango review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
