| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2014 Ford Mustang and 2006 Ford Five Hundred Specifications
| Model Year | 2014 | 2006 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Ford Five Hundred | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,720 mm | 2,868 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,788 mm | 5,098 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,877 mm | 1,892 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,417 mm | 1,527 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,588 kg | 1,652 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 76 L | -15 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 978 mm | 1,001 mm | 977 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,405 mm | 1,468 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,356 mm | 1,364 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,046 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 881 mm | 980 mm | -99 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,214 mm | 1,463 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,189 mm | 1,361 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 757 mm | 1,064 mm | 756 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,834 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,111 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume | 379 L | 600 L | -221 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Mustang
| 2014 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Mustang
| 2014 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather. see full Ford Mustang review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Ford Five Hundred
| 2006 Ford Five Hundred Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr Sedan 203-horsepower 3.0L V6 6-speed automatic FWD |
very comfortable on long trips see full Ford Five Hundred review |
| 2007 | 4dr Sedan 203-horsepower 3.0L V6 6-speed automatic FWD |
REally comfortable see full Ford Five Hundred review |
| 2006 | 4dr Sedan 203-horsepower 3.0L V6 CVT AWD |
The Limited interior is very confy and I hear that the 2008 taurus is even better. see full Ford Five Hundred review |
| 2006 | 4dr Sedan 203-horsepower 3.0L V6 6-speed automatic FWD |
sits high, plenty of room see full Ford Five Hundred review |
| 2006 | 4dr Sedan 203-horsepower 3.0L V6 6-speed automatic FWD |
large seats and sits high see full Ford Five Hundred review |
| 2006 | 4dr Sedan 203-horsepower 3.0L V6 CVT AWD |
Ample room for 6+ see full Ford Five Hundred review |
| 2005 | 4dr Sedan 203-horsepower 3.0L V6 6-speed automatic FWD |
6 foot + individuals will love the leg room front and back and the command level seating (sits up higher than a regular car) see full Ford Five Hundred review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
