Ford Mustang (2003) vs. Honda Ridgeline (2012) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2003 Ford Mustang and 2012 Honda Ridgeline specs.
2003 Ford Mustang and 2012 Honda Ridgeline Specifications
Model Year |
2003 |
2012 |
|
Model |
Ford Mustang |
Honda Ridgeline |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Total Legroom |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2003 Ford Mustang
2003 |
2dr Convertible 190-horsepower 3.8L V6 4-speed automatic RWD |
The existence of a rear seat, comfortable or not, was a major factor.
see full Ford Mustang review |
2003 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2003 |
2dr Convertible 190-horsepower 3.8L V6 4-speed automatic RWD |
Front seats are not particularly comfortable but not so different from most cars I've driven. I've already bought seat cushions. I've put long days on a bicycle I ride regularly which is more comfortable than anything between a vintage VW Beetle and a modern Buick with the exception of a Renault 16. In fact most car makers would do well to go out and find a 1972 Renault 16 and take very, very careful note of the seats.
But seat comfort was secondary to other considerations such as water-tightness of the convertible. Not a deal-breaker.
see full Ford Mustang review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Honda Ridgeline
2012 |
4dr SUT 250-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
I too love that the rearseats can both flip up. This offers me alot of rear floor space to haul my music gear instead of laying it out on the rear bed area.
see full Honda Ridgeline review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
Coupes and
Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all
Ford models.