| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2014 Ford Mustang and 2010 Honda Ridgeline Specifications
| Model Year | 2014 | 2010 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Honda Ridgeline | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Convertible | 4dr SUT | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 107.1 in | 122.0 in | -14.9 in |
| Length | 188.5 in | 206.8 in | -18.3 in |
| Width | 73.9 in | 76.3 in | -2.4 in |
| Height | 55.8 in | 70.3 in | -14.5 in |
| Curb Weight | 3630 lb. | 4503 lb. | -873 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.0 gal. | 22.0 gal. | -6 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.8 in | 40.7 in | -1.9 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 55.3 in | 63.2 in | -7.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 53.4 in | 57.6 in | -4.2 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.4 in | 40.8 in | 1.6 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 36.5 in | 39.1 in | -2.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 45.0 in | 62.6 in | -17.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 45.2 in | 57.2 in | -12 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 29.8 in | 36.4 in | -6.6 in |
| Total Legroom | 72.2 in (over 2 rows) | 77.2 in (over 2 rows) | -5 in |
| Cargo Volume | 9.6 ft3 | 0.0 | 9.6 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Mustang
| 2014 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Mustang
| 2014 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather. see full Ford Mustang review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Honda Ridgeline
| 2010 Honda Ridgeline Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr SUT 250-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
The interior is the Ridgelines stronges point. Comfortable front and back and a feeling a space. The lack of transmission tunnel and column mounted shifter in particular make the front cabin roomy. see full Honda Ridgeline review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
