| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2014 Ford Mustang and 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee Specifications
| Model Year | 2014 | 2006 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 107.1 in | 109.5 in | -2.4 in |
| Length | 188.5 in | 186.6 in | 1.9 in |
| Width | 73.9 in | 73.3 in | 0.6 in |
| Height | 55.8 in | 67.7 in | -11.9 in |
| Curb Weight | 3501 lb. | 4254 lb. | -753 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.0 gal. | 20.8 gal. | -4.8 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.5 in | 39.7 in | -1.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 55.3 in | 59.1 in | -3.8 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 53.4 in | 57.6 in | -4.2 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.4 in | 41.7 in | 0.7 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 34.7 in | 39.3 in | -4.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 47.8 in | 58.5 in | -10.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 46.8 in | 60.6 in | -13.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 29.8 in | 35.5 in | -5.7 in |
| Total Legroom | 72.2 in (over 2 rows) | 77.2 in (over 2 rows) | -5 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 13.4 ft3 | 34.5 ft3 | -21.1 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.4 ft3 | 67.4 ft3 | -54 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Mustang
| 2014 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Mustang
| 2014 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather. see full Ford Mustang review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee
| 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2005 | 4dr SUV 210-horsepower 3.7L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Very comfortable driving. see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
| 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 235-horsepower 4.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
That and MPG are the only real faults so far after 15000 miles and 15 mons. I think our 2001 GC has more seat comfort although the 07s seats do fold over easier than the 01s. see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
| 2005 | 4dr SUV 210-horsepower 3.7L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Very little leg room for an adult. see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
