| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2014 Ford Mustang and 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee Specifications
| Model Year | 2014 | 2011 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 107.1 in | 114.8 in | -7.7 in |
| Length | 188.5 in | 189.8 in | -1.3 in |
| Width | 73.9 in | 76.3 in | -2.4 in |
| Height | 55.8 in | 69.4 in | -13.6 in |
| Curb Weight | 3501 lb. | 4470 lb. | -969 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.0 gal. | 24.6 gal. | -8.6 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.5 in | 40.0 in | -1.5 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 55.3 in | 58.6 in | -3.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 53.4 in | 57.0 in | -3.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.4 in | 40.3 in | 2.1 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 34.7 in | 39.3 in | -4.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 47.8 in | 58.0 in | -10.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 46.8 in | 56.5 in | -9.7 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 29.8 in | 38.6 in | -8.8 in |
| Total Legroom | 72.2 in (over 2 rows) | 78.9 in (over 2 rows) | -6.7 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 13.4 ft3 | 36.3 ft3 | -22.9 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.4 ft3 | 68.3 ft3 | -54.9 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Mustang
| 2014 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Mustang
| 2014 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather. see full Ford Mustang review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee
| 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 360-horsepower 5.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
Huge rear seat leg room and reclining rear seats see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 290-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
Great head room (no sunroof), excellent ergonomic design to the seat backs, and vertically adjustable lumbar support see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 360-horsepower 5.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
Seats are supportive and highly adjustable. see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
| 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 360-horsepower 5.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
They are harder than I would like. I came from an F150 with the luxury package and the seats were amazing, these sears are hard and could be improved upon by being softer. see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
