| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2014 Ford Mustang and 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee Specifications
| Model Year | 2014 | 2011 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,720 mm | 2,916 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,788 mm | 4,821 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,877 mm | 1,938 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,417 mm | 1,763 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,588 kg | 2,028 kg | -1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 93 L | -32 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 978 mm | 1,016 mm | 977 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,405 mm | 1,488 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,356 mm | 1,448 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,024 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 881 mm | 998 mm | -117 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,214 mm | 1,473 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,189 mm | 1,435 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 757 mm | 980 mm | -223 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,834 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,004 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 379 L | 1,028 L | 378 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.4 | 1,934 L | 12.4 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Mustang
| 2014 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Mustang
| 2014 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather. see full Ford Mustang review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee
| 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 360-horsepower 5.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
Huge rear seat leg room and reclining rear seats see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 290-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
Great head room (no sunroof), excellent ergonomic design to the seat backs, and vertically adjustable lumbar support see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 360-horsepower 5.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
Seats are supportive and highly adjustable. see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
| 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 360-horsepower 5.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
They are harder than I would like. I came from an F150 with the luxury package and the seats were amazing, these sears are hard and could be improved upon by being softer. see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
