| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2006 Ford Mustang and 2010 Mazda CX-9 Specifications
| Model Year | 2006 | 2010 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Mazda CX-9 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,720 mm | 2,875 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,765 mm | 5,085 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,877 mm | 1,935 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,407 mm | 1,727 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,530 kg | 1,964 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 76 L | -15 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 980 mm | 1,006 mm | 979 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,407 mm | 1,509 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,361 mm | 1,435 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,085 mm | 1,039 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 881 mm | 991 mm | -110 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,356 mm | 1,491 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,189 mm | 1,422 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 770 mm | 1,011 mm | 769 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 899 mm | -899 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,445 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,110 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 823 mm | -823 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,854 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,873 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 371 L | 487 L | -116 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 13.1 | 1,368 L | 12.1 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.1 | 2,852 L | 11.1 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Ford Mustang
| 2006 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2006 | 2dr Convertible 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
seat is comfortable can be adjusted to suit your choice of position all controls are within easy reach see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2005 | 2dr Convertible 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
Driving position is very flexible, all the controls are within reach and easy to use. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2005 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
Plenty of leg room for tall people like me. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2006 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
While our present government may blow off the standards & principles of the Geneva Convention, I still find them worthy enough to abide. Mustang rear seats are in clear violation. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2005 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
The Mustang is a cool car, but nowhere near as comfortable see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2005 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
Not much room in the back of a Mustang... see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2005 | 2dr Coupe 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is small for adults. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2005 | 2dr Convertible 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
Rear seat is for kids. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2005 | 2dr Convertible 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
Rear seats in name only. No real passenger room see full Ford Mustang review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Mazda CX-9
| 2010 Mazda CX-9 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat hugs in the right places without being cumbersome. Headrest position is much better than the midsize GM vehicles I test-drove (Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, Buick Enclave). see full Mazda CX-9 review |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Easy access to third row, good leg room in second and third row. see full Mazda CX-9 review |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Access to the 3rd row is better than any other 7 passenger SUV I drove. see full Mazda CX-9 review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
