| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Ford Mustang and 2009 Volkswagen Eos Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2009 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Volkswagen Eos | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Convertible | 2dr Hardtop conv. | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 107.1 in | 101.5 in | 5.6 in |
| Length | 188.3 in | 173.5 in | 14.8 in |
| Width | 75.4 in | 70.5 in | 4.9 in |
| Height | 54.9 in | 56.8 in | -1.9 in |
| Curb Weight | 3644 lb. | 3505 lb. | 139 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.0 gal. | 14.5 gal. | 1.5 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 37.6 in | 37.5 in | 0.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.3 in | 54.7 in | 1.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 54.9 in | 0.0 in | 54.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.0 in | 41.7 in | 0.3 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 35.7 in | 35.8 in | -0.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 44.7 in | 41.5 in | 3.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 43.7 in | 0.0 in | 43.7 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 30.8 in | 32.5 in | -1.7 in |
| Total Legroom | 72.8 in (over 2 rows) | 74.2 in (over 2 rows) | -1.4 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 11.4 ft3 | 6.6 ft3 | 4.8 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 11.4 ft3 | 10.5 ft3 | 0.9 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
| 2016 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Volkswagen Eos
| 2009 Volkswagen Eos Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
The car is comfy on long trips, and the seat heaters are super. The car is great with the top down—if you deploy the wind deflector, you don’t get your hair blown all over the place. The faux leather on the seats is fine-- you can only get real leather if you get the LUX model, and then you can’t have a manual transmission. see full Volkswagen Eos review |
| 2009 Volkswagen Eos Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual FWD |
Seat is small and okay for short trips. Adults fit okay when the top is down, access is tight witht the top up. see full Volkswagen Eos review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
