| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Ford Mustang and 2011 Volvo C30 Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2011 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Volvo C30 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 2dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,720 mm | 2,639 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,783 mm | 4,252 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,915 mm | 1,783 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,382 mm | 1,448 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,599 kg | 1,452 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 60 L | 1 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 955 mm | 970 mm | -15 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,430 mm | 1,361 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,394 mm | 1,349 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,067 mm | 1,074 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 884 mm | 925 mm | -41 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,326 mm | 1,194 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,204 mm | 1,054 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 777 mm | 861 mm | -84 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,844 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,935 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 382 L | 365 L | 17 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.5 | 572 L | -558.5 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
| 2016 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Volvo C30
| 2011 Volvo C30 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 2dr Hatch turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5 6-speed manual FWD |
The front seats are wonderful. I tend to get stiff and sore when I sit too long in a car, especially my old VW GTI and our other VW Passat wagon. These seats in the C30 are very comfortable and I felt good getting out after a long drive. see full Volvo C30 review |
| 2011 | 2dr Hatch turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Excellent support for very long drives. Passengers in the rear say the same. see full Volvo C30 review |
| 2011 Volvo C30 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 2dr Hatch turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Lack of leg room. This car is a two seater. see full Volvo C30 review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
