| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Ford Mustang and 2011 Volvo V50 Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2011 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Volvo V50 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Convertible | 4dr Wagon | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,720 mm | 2,639 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,783 mm | 4,521 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,915 mm | 1,770 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,394 mm | 1,473 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,653 kg | 1,619 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 60 L | 1 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 955 mm | 988 mm | -33 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,430 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,394 mm | 1,364 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,067 mm | 1,057 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 907 mm | 968 mm | -61 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,135 mm | 1,374 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,110 mm | 1,288 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 782 mm | 874 mm | -92 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,849 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,930 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 323 L | 362 L | -39 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 11.4 | 1,252 L | 10.4 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
| 2016 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Volvo V50
| 2011 Volvo V50 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Sedan turbocharged 113hp 1.6L I4 Diesel 6-speed manual FWD |
Rear seat is slightly hampered by limited head/leg/sideways room, but for normal sized persons the seat is fantastic for two with splending leg and back support. Car is also very silent, making long drives a pleasure. see full Volvo V50 review |
| 2010 | 4dr Wagon 168-horsepower 2.4L I5 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Lots of front seat room. Good dash design accommodates tall passengers with rear facing car seat behind. Seat was vertically adjustable providing lots of hear room. see full Volvo V50 review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
