Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2000 Toyota RAV4 Toyota RAV4 2010

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Ford Ranger (2000) vs. Toyota RAV4 (2010) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2000 Ford Ranger and 2010 Toyota RAV4 specs.

2000 Ford Ranger and 2010 Toyota RAV4 Specifications

Model Year 2000 2010  
Model Ford Ranger Toyota RAV4  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body  
      Difference
Total Legroom 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2000 Ford Ranger

2000 Ford Ranger Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2001 2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 119-horsepower 2.5L I4
5-speed manual RWD
Standard cab leg room not good for anyone over 6 ft see full Ford Ranger review
2000 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 150-horsepower 3.0L V6
4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
Too small for anyone over the age of ten. see full Ford Ranger review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Toyota RAV4

2010 Toyota RAV4 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2009 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic AWD
Easy access for us older folk and plenty of room once we get there. see full Toyota RAV4 review
2010 Toyota RAV4 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2011 4dr SUV 179-horsepower 2.5L I4
4-speed automatic AWD
back seat is hard, not much leg room see full Toyota RAV4 review
2010 4dr SUV 179-horsepower 2.5L I4
4-speed automatic AWD
no lumbar support see full Toyota RAV4 review
2009 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic FWD
Harder seats than in the Murano, and now in a good way. The Murano has power lumbar support, letting you melt in the seat as much as you wish. Better lateral support in the Murano as well. see full Toyota RAV4 review
 
See TrueDelta's information for all Pickups
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.