MENU
1 0 3 4 3 4

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Ford Taurus X vs. Chrysler 200 Fuel Economy (g/100m)

Chart is based on 267 fuel economy reports for the Ford Taurus X and 101 fuel economy reports for the Chrysler 200.

Ford Taurus X g/100m

Ford Taurus X Ford Taurus X 2009 5.2 MPG Highway Percentage 62 percent Ford Taurus X Ford Taurus X 2009 5.9 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Ford Taurus X Ford Taurus X 2008 4.7 MPG Highway Percentage 64 percent Ford Taurus X Ford Taurus X 2008 5.1 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd g/100m
2009 4dr Wagon 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed automatic FWD		 flat med light 0 28 10 62 70 5.2  
2009 4dr Wagon 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed automatic AWD		 flat lead none 10 25 10 55 65 5.9  
2008 4dr Wagon 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed automatic FWD		 flat lead light 0 0 36 64 80 4.7  
2008 4dr Wagon 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed automatic AWD		 flat light light 2 7 21 70 69 5.1  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Ford Taurus X fuel economy data.

Chrysler 200 g/100m

Chrysler 200 Chrysler 200 2016 3.5 MPG Highway Percentage 28 percent Chrysler 200 Chrysler 200 2015 3.8 MPG Highway Percentage 79 percent Chrysler 200 Chrysler 200 2015 3.4 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Chrysler 200 Chrysler 200 2015 19.7 MPG Highway Percentage 63 percent Chrysler 200 Chrysler 200 2012 6.2 MPG Highway Percentage 5 percent Chrysler 200 Chrysler 200 2011 3.1 MPG Highway Percentage 100 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd g/100m
2016 4dr Sedan 295-horsepower 3.6L V6
9-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 flat light light 1 19 52 28 69 3.5  
2015 4dr Sedan 295-horsepower 3.6L V6
9-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat med light 3 5 13 79 79 3.8  
2015 4dr Sedan 184-horsepower 2.4L I4
9-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 hills light none 0 20 0 80 80 3.4  
2015 4dr Sedan 184-horsepower 2.4L I4
9-speed automatic FWD		 flat light none 0 1 36 63 88 19.7  
2012 4dr Sedan 283-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 flat light none 0 95 0 5 60 6.2  
2011 4dr Sedan 173-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 flat light hvy 0 0 0 100 70 3.1  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Chrysler 200 fuel economy data.

Ford Taurus X vs. Chrysler 200 Fuel Economy (g/100m)

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Ford Taurus X and Chrysler 200's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world g/100m based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all Wagons
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models and Chrysler models.

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Ford Taurus X

Ford Taurus X Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2008 4dr Wagon 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed automatic AWD		 For an AWD beast, 25.6 miles per US gallon on the highway (6 hr run) into ski country, on snow tires, is pretty darned good at 70 mph. see full Ford Taurus X review
Ford Taurus X Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2008 4dr Wagon 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed automatic AWD		 In town we regularly got 15-16 mpg, and we rarely cracked 22 mpg on the highway. This was consistent with the 15/22 EPA ratings. see full Ford Taurus X review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the 2001 Chrysler 200

None of our members have yet commented on the real gas mileage of the 2001 Chrysler 200.

Be the first!