We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Ford Taurus X vs. Land Rover Range Rover Sport Fuel Economy (L/100km)

Chart is based on 267 fuel economy reports for the Ford Taurus X and 9 fuel economy reports for the Land Rover Range Rover Sport.

Ford Taurus X L/100km

Ford Taurus X Ford Taurus X 2009 12.2 MPG Highway Percentage 62 percent Ford Taurus X Ford Taurus X 2009 13.8 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Ford Taurus X Ford Taurus X 2008 11.0 MPG Highway Percentage 64 percent Ford Taurus X Ford Taurus X 2008 11.9 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd L/100km
2009 4dr Wagon 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed automatic FWD
flat med light 0 28 10 62 70 12.2  
2009 4dr Wagon 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed automatic AWD
flat lead none 10 25 10 55 65 13.8  
2008 4dr Wagon 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed automatic FWD
flat lead light 0 0 36 64 80 11.0  
2008 4dr Wagon 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed automatic AWD
flat light light 2 7 21 70 69 11.9  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Ford Taurus X fuel economy data.

Land Rover Range Rover Sport L/100km

Land Rover Range Rover Sport Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013 14.9 MPG Highway Percentage 5 percent Land Rover Range Rover Sport Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 12.8 MPG Highway Percentage 77 percent Land Rover Range Rover Sport Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2008 12.1 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Land Rover Range Rover Sport Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2006 14.3 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Land Rover Range Rover Sport Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2006 15.1 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd L/100km
2013 4dr SUV 375-horsepower 5.0L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range
flat v.lt none 1 9 85 5 70 14.9  
2009 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 4.4L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range
flat light none 3 0 20 77 65 12.8  
2008 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 4.4L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range
flat light none 0 0 20 80 65 12.1  
2006 4dr SUV supercharged 390hp 4.2L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range
flat lead light 25 25 0 50 75 14.3  
2006 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 4.4L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range
flat med light 5 5 15 75 70 15.1  

Return to top

Ford Taurus X vs. Land Rover Range Rover Sport Fuel Economy (L/100km)

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Ford Taurus X and Land Rover Range Rover Sport's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world L/100km based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all Wagons
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models and Land Rover models.

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Ford Taurus X

Ford Taurus X Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2008 4dr Wagon 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed automatic AWD
For an AWD beast, 25.6 miles per US gallon on the highway (6 hr run) into ski country, on snow tires, is pretty darned good at 70 mph. see full Ford Taurus X review
Ford Taurus X Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2008 4dr Wagon 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed automatic AWD
In town we regularly got 15-16 mpg, and we rarely cracked 22 mpg on the highway. This was consistent with the 15/22 EPA ratings. see full Ford Taurus X review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport

None of our members have yet commented on the real gas mileage of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport.

Be the first!