Ford Transit Connect vs. Chevrolet HHR MPG

Chart is based on 1 fuel economy reports for the Ford Transit Connect and 393 fuel economy reports for the Chevrolet HHR.

Ford Transit Connect MPG

Year	Body/Powertrain	flat, hilly, or mountainousLand	driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot	A/C use: none to heavyA/C	constant stop and goTraf %	many stops per mileCity %	stop every mile or twoSub %	fairly steady speedHwy %	Hwy Spd	MPG
2013	4dr Minivan 136-horsepower 2.0L I4 4-speed automatic FWD	flat	light	light	0	5	60	35	65	24.8

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Ford Transit Connect fuel economy data.

Chevrolet HHR MPG

Year	Body/Powertrain	flat, hilly, or mountainousLand	driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot	A/C use: none to heavyA/C	constant stop and goTraf %	many stops per mileCity %	stop every mile or twoSub %	fairly steady speedHwy %	Hwy Spd	MPG
2011	4dr Wagon 155-horsepower 2.2L I4 4-speed automatic FWD	flat	light	light	0	30	10	60	60	15.8
2010	4dr Wagon 155-horsepower 2.2L I4 4-speed automatic FWD	flat	light	none	11	21	20	48	67	27.2
2009	4dr Wagon turbocharged 260hp 2.0L I4 5-speed manual FWD	flat	med	light	10	20	30	40	60	29.0
2009	4dr Wagon turbocharged 250hp 2.0L I4 4-speed automatic FWD	flat	med	light	10	10	5	75	75	25.9
2009	4dr Wagon 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed manual FWD	flat	light	light	5	20	40	35	62	33.4
2009	4dr Wagon 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic FWD	flat	light	light	8	14	30	48	63	28.0
2009	4dr Wagon 155-horsepower 2.2L I4 5-speed manual FWD	flat	light	hvy	10	0	40	50	60	27.9
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2009	4dr Wagon 155-horsepower 2.2L I4 4-speed automatic FWD	flat	v.lt	none	0	35	24	41	60	28.1
2008	4dr Wagon turbocharged 260hp 2.0L I4 5-speed manual FWD	flat	med	hvy	0	13	4	83	70	27.1
2008	4dr Wagon turbocharged 250hp 2.0L I4 4-speed automatic FWD	flat	med	none	0	0	20	80	70	27.3
2008	4dr Wagon 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic FWD	flat	med	light	4	23	34	40	71	23.8
2008	4dr Wagon 149-horsepower 2.2L I4 5-speed manual FWD	flat	light	none	25	25	25	25	100	39.5
2008	4dr Wagon 149-horsepower 2.2L I4 4-speed automatic FWD	flat	med	light	8	10	13	70	70	30.1
2007	4dr Wagon 175-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed manual FWD	flat	med	none	5	5	50	40	68	29.4
2007	4dr Wagon 175-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic FWD	flat	light	light	6	20	23	51	67	26.2
2007	4dr Wagon 149-horsepower 2.2L I4 5-speed manual FWD	flat	light	none	7	8	14	71	61	31.8
2007	4dr Wagon 149-horsepower 2.2L I4 4-speed automatic FWD	flat	light	none	9	12	17	62	77	29.5
2006	4dr Wagon 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed manual FWD	flat	light	light	7	15	50	28	63	30.7
2006	4dr Wagon 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic FWD	flat	light	light	5	13	23	59	66	27.1
2006	4dr Wagon 143-horsepower 2.2L I4 5-speed manual FWD	flat	med	light	7	25	23	45	77	29.5
2006	4dr Wagon 143-horsepower 2.2L I4 4-speed automatic FWD	flat	med	light	8	23	21	48	71	27.5

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Chevrolet HHR fuel economy data.

See TrueDelta's information for all Minivans

See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models and Chevrolet models.

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Ford Transit Connect

Ford Transit Connect Real Gas Mileage: Pros
Year	Comment
2014	With less size and weight and a smaller engine, the Ford Transit Connect does get better fuel economy than a conventional minivan...but its advantage isn't large. The Ford's EPA ratings--20 mpg city, 28 mpg highway--best the Toyota Sienna's by two in the city and three on the highway. But the Honda Odyssey is rated 19/28. On the other hand, the much smaller, much lighter Mazda5 only managed 21/28. What's going on? Well, the Ford is very tall, so even though it's narrower it's pushing nearly as much frontal area through the air. This especially matters on the highway. Also, the Transit Connect is not much lighter, 3,979 lbs. to the Sienna's 4,310. Two tons is a lot of weight for a 2.5-liter four-cylinder to motivate. In the real-world, a light foot in the suburbs could nudge the trip computer average to 27 (even 30 on one trip). The Odyssey's trip computer reported numbers about five below these, while the Sienna struggled to crack 20. Push the Transit Connect a bit harder, and the trip computer average dropped to about 23, still good for a vehicle its size. But was the trip computer accurate? The gas gauge needle fell much faster than these numbers suggested it should have. On a 70-mph highway, even the trip computer numbers were short of the EPA rating, about 25. The big minivans can do this well. Blame the Ford's frontal area. The Transit Connect's fuel economy advantage is chiefly in urban and suburban driving. see full Ford Transit Connect review

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Ford Transit Connect

None of our members have yet commented on the real gas mileage of the Ford Transit Connect.

Be the first!

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Chevrolet HHR

Chevrolet HHR Real Gas Mileage: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2010	4dr Wagon 155-horsepower 2.2L I4 4-speed automatic FWD	Average around 22mpg in the city--and up to 36 on the freeway. Combined driving easily averages 32mpg. see full Chevrolet HHR review
2009	4dr Wagon 155-horsepower 2.2L I4 4-speed automatic FWD	It gets great fuel economy. I only need to fill the tank approximately every third week. see full Chevrolet HHR review
2009	4dr Wagon 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic FWD	Had a PT that avg. was 19mpg. HHR avg. is 29mpg so far. see full Chevrolet HHR review
2008	4dr Wagon turbocharged 260hp 2.0L I4 5-speed manual FWD	260hp....260 lb torque....33 mpg highway and 27mpg mixed driving....enough said. Show me another car that matches those numbers. see full Chevrolet HHR review
2008	4dr Wagon turbocharged 260hp 2.0L I4 5-speed manual FWD	Great gas mileage for a car that is so powerful. see full Chevrolet HHR review
2008	4dr Wagon turbocharged 260hp 2.0L I4 5-speed manual FWD	RE the HHR SS model, highway mileage with heavy footing out of toll booths with 3 total passengers yielded 27.5 mpg. see full Chevrolet HHR review
2008	4dr Wagon turbocharged 260hp 2.0L I4 5-speed manual FWD	For as quick as the HHR SS is, the fuel economy nearing 30MPG is phenominal. see full Chevrolet HHR review
2008	4dr Wagon turbocharged 260hp 2.0L I4 5-speed manual FWD	Twice what I was getting in my previous commuter vehicle, and much more fun to drive. see full Chevrolet HHR review
2008	4dr Wagon 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic FWD	30+ MPG on the highway see full Chevrolet HHR review
2008	4dr Wagon 149-horsepower 2.2L I4 5-speed manual FWD	about 30. great see full Chevrolet HHR review

Chevrolet HHR Real Gas Mileage: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2006	4dr Wagon 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic FWD	Could be better considering that many larger cars get the same mileage. see full Chevrolet HHR review