| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2015 Ford Transit Connect and 2010 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2015 | 2010 | |
| Model | Ford Transit Connect | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Minivan, ext. | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 3,063 mm | 2,720 mm | 1 mm |
| Length | 4,818 mm | 4,778 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,834 mm | 1,877 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,829 mm | 1,412 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,805 kg | 1,543 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 60 L | 61 L | -1 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,191 mm | 978 mm | -977 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,466 mm | 1,405 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,387 mm | 1,356 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,024 mm | 1,077 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,146 mm | 881 mm | -880 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,486 mm | 1,311 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,486 mm | 1,189 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 955 mm | 757 mm | 198 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 1,049 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,430 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,194 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 889 mm | 0 mm | 889 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,868 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,834 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 561 L | 379 L | 182 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,668 L | 13.4 | -12.4 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,951 L | 13.4 | -11.4 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Transit Connect
| 2015 Ford Transit Connect Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The Transit Connect's second-row bench is roomy and fairly comfortable for two people, but somewhat tight for three. The Sienna has another half-foot of shoulder room. Also, the seatback in the Ford's second row does not recline. If you do want captain's chairs, well, they're not an option. The situation worsens in the Ford's third row, which is less substantial and much lower to the floor than the third-row seats in the Honda or the Toyota. Unlike the Transit Connect's second row, its third-row seat does slide fore-aft (about six inches) and recline. Slide it all the way back, and legroom becomes almost generous. Still, it isn't a place many adults would want to spend much time. On top of this, it should be easier to open and close the Transit Connect's sliding doors and to get into its third row. The second row doesn't tip or slide forward like those in conventional minivans. Instead, it must be pushed to the floor in a fairly difficult two-step procedure. see full Ford Transit Connect review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Transit Connect
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Ford Transit Connect.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Ford Mustang
| 2010 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
Very confortable seats, The stock seats hold you pretty well even in a little senmi-agressing driving. Nice position in the power seats and easy to get the just right spot. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2010 | 2dr Convertible 315-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
The adjustability of the power seat. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2009 | 2dr Coupe 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed manual RWD |
Perfect seating position for both of us. Nice cush for your tush see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2010 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 2dr Coupe 305-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
Felt like seating position was "on the floor". Steering wheel had only tilt adjustment, no telescope. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2010 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
What rear seat room? see full Ford Mustang review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Minivans
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
