MENU
1 0 3 4 3 4

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Ford Transit Connect vs. Land Rover LR2 Fuel Economy (L/100km)

Chart is based on 1 fuel economy reports for the Ford Transit Connect and 61 fuel economy reports for the Land Rover LR2.

Ford Transit Connect L/100km

Ford Transit Connect Ford Transit Connect 2013 9.5 MPG Highway Percentage 35 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd L/100km
2013 4dr Minivan 136-horsepower 2.0L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat light light 0 5 60 35 65 9.5  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Ford Transit Connect fuel economy data.

Land Rover LR2 L/100km

Land Rover LR2 Land Rover LR2 2013 18.6 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Land Rover LR2 Land Rover LR2 2010 10.8 MPG Highway Percentage 58 percent Land Rover LR2 Land Rover LR2 2009 8.4 MPG Highway Percentage 25 percent Land Rover LR2 Land Rover LR2 2009 11.1 MPG Highway Percentage 51 percent Land Rover LR2 Land Rover LR2 2008 9.0 MPG Highway Percentage 28 percent Land Rover LR2 Land Rover LR2 2008 12.9 MPG Highway Percentage 19 percent Land Rover LR2 Land Rover LR2 2007.5 10.1 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd L/100km
2013 4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat light light 0 50 10 40 80 18.6  
2010 4dr SUV 230-horsepower 3.2L I6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat med light 6 12 24 58 64 10.8  
2009 4dr SUV turbocharged 160hp 2.2L I4 Diesel
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat med light 15 20 40 25 120 8.4  
2009 4dr SUV 230-horsepower 3.2L I6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat light light 6 7 36 51 66 11.1  
2008 4dr SUV turbocharged 160hp 2.2L I4 Diesel
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat light light 10 25 38 28 110 9.0  
2008 4dr SUV 230-horsepower 3.2L I6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat med none 12 41 28 19 71 12.9  
2007.5 4dr SUV turbocharged 160hp 2.2L I4 Diesel
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 hills med light 5 20 20 55 70 10.1  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Land Rover LR2 fuel economy data.

Ford Transit Connect vs. Land Rover LR2 Fuel Economy (L/100km)

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Ford Transit Connect and Land Rover LR2's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world L/100km based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all Minivans
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models and Land Rover models.

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Ford Transit Connect

Ford Transit Connect Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearComment
2014 With less size and weight and a smaller engine, the Ford Transit Connect does get better fuel economy than a conventional minivan...but its advantage isn't large. The Ford's EPA ratings--20 mpg city, 28 mpg highway--best the Toyota Sienna's by two in the city and three on the highway. But the Honda Odyssey is rated 19/28. On the other hand, the much smaller, much lighter Mazda5 only managed 21/28. What's going on? Well, the Ford is very tall, so even though it's narrower it's pushing nearly as much frontal area through the air. This especially matters on the highway. Also, the Transit Connect is not much lighter, 3,979 lbs. to the Sienna's 4,310. Two tons is a lot of weight for a 2.5-liter four-cylinder to motivate. In the real-world, a light foot in the suburbs could nudge the trip computer average to 27 (even 30 on one trip). The Odyssey's trip computer reported numbers about five below these, while the Sienna struggled to crack 20. Push the Transit Connect a bit harder, and the trip computer average dropped to about 23, still good for a vehicle its size. But was the trip computer accurate? The gas gauge needle fell much faster than these numbers suggested it should have. On a 70-mph highway, even the trip computer numbers were short of the EPA rating, about 25. The big minivans can do this well. Blame the Ford's frontal area. The Transit Connect's fuel economy advantage is chiefly in urban and suburban driving. see full Ford Transit Connect review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Ford Transit Connect

None of our members have yet commented on the real gas mileage of the Ford Transit Connect.

Be the first!

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Land Rover LR2

Land Rover LR2 Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2009 4dr SUV turbocharged 160hp 2.2L I4 Diesel
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 Great on fuel ave. 27.3 mpg see full Land Rover LR2 review
Land Rover LR2 Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2008 4dr SUV 230-horsepower 3.2L I6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 Horrible - upwards of 25L/100km with short trips in cold weather. But surprisingly good on the highway - less than 10L/100km when using premium fuel and speed control see full Land Rover LR2 review