

Model Year | 2015 | 2016 | |
Model | GMC Terrain | Ford C-MAX | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,858 mm | 2,649 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,707 mm | 4,409 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,849 mm | 1,829 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,684 mm | 1,623 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,748 kg | 1,636 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 71 L | 51 L | 20 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,011 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,415 mm | 1,420 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,400 mm | 1,379 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,046 mm | 1,026 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 996 mm | 1,001 mm | 995 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,405 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,303 mm | 1,318 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 1,013 mm | 927 mm | -926 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,060 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,953 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 895 L | 694 L | 201 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,809 L | 1,489 L | 0 L |
2015 GMC Terrain Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2015 | 4dr SUV 301-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The rear seat room is plentiful, and because rear seat can be slid forward and back, you can shift between needing more leg room and using more of the cargo area. We had traded in a 2015 Dodge Journey for the Terrain, because of safety concerns, but realized after we had it for awhile, the rear seat of the Journey was not able to go back far enough into the cargo area, and because of the bulky and high mounted head rests, you felt trapped. The Terrain does not have these issues and feels much more roomy and comfortable. The rear seats are supportive and not at all like some back seats that feel like they were an afterthought. see full GMC Terrain review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford C-MAX.