Model Year | 2010 | 2017 | |
Model | Honda Civic | Honda Pilot | |
Engine | 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 147 kW@7800 188 Nm@6200 |
3.5L V6 OHC-4v 209 kW@6000 355 Nm@4700 |
|
Transmission | 6-speed manual | 6-speed automatic | |
Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,700 mm | 2,819 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,488 mm | 4,940 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,753 mm | 1,996 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,435 mm | 1,773 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,321 kg | 1,839 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 50 L | 74 L | -24 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,001 mm | 1,019 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,364 mm | 1,575 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,318 mm | 1,501 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,072 mm | 1,039 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 950 mm | 1,021 mm | 949 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,331 mm | 1,575 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,295 mm | 1,455 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 879 mm | 975 mm | -96 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 988 mm | -988 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,463 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,133 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 810 mm | -810 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,951 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,824 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 340 L | 467 L | -127 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 12.0 | 1,325 L | 11 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 12.0 | 2,376 L | 10 |
2010 Honda Civic Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 4dr Sedan 197-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
The seats fit me perfectly. see full Honda Civic review |
2010 Honda Civic Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 2dr Coupe 140-horsepower 1.8L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
Rear seat was a bit tight for adults, in hindsight we should have bought the Accord. see full Honda Civic review |
2009 | 4dr Sedan 140-horsepower 1.8L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
Driver seat is uncomfortable. Not upright enough. Not a great seat for correct posture. see full Honda Civic review |
2017 Honda Pilot Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2016 | According to their spec sheets, the Ford Explorer and Nissan Pathfinder have more rear legroom than the new Honda Pilot. In practice, though, the Pilot's rear legroom feels at least as generous as theirs--I suspect some creative measuring--and well ahead of what you'll find in a Toyota Highlander. The Pilot's second-row seat isn't as high off the floor as the Ford Explorer's, but is more comfortably positioned than the low benches in the GM crossovers and the Pathfinder. The Elite trim level includes captains chairs, so it can only seat up to seven people. With a second-row split bench, other Pilots can seat eight people. The Pilot's largest seating advantage is its third row. Unlike in most crossovers, the cabin remains broad in the "way back," so there's enough shoulder room for three passengers. The Highlander's third-row bench, though also designed for three passengers, is somewhat narrower and lacking in legroom. Only the GM crossovers roughly match the new Pilot in third-row space as well as passenger capacity. The Pilot's seats are positioned so that the view forward from each is open, further enhancing perceived roominess. see full Honda Pilot review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Honda Pilot.