| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Honda Ridgeline and 2003 Mazda Mazda6 Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2003 | |
| Model | Honda Ridgeline | Mazda Mazda6 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Honda Ridgeline
| 2010 Honda Ridgeline Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr SUT 250-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
The interior is the Ridgelines stronges point. Comfortable front and back and a feeling a space. The lack of transmission tunnel and column mounted shifter in particular make the front cabin roomy. see full Honda Ridgeline review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2003 Mazda Mazda6
| 2003 Mazda Mazda6 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2004 | 4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.0L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
I don't find it a very comfortable car for trips over about an hour. see full Mazda Mazda6 review |
| 2004 | 4dr Sedan 160-horsepower 2.3L I4 4-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Not big enough across for three small children. Less legroom than my 1994 Honda Accord, which was about the same size overall. see full Mazda Mazda6 review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUTs
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
