| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Honda Ridgeline and 2009 Toyota Camry Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2009 | |
| Model | Honda Ridgeline | Toyota Camry | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUT | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 3,099 mm | 2,776 mm | 1 mm |
| Length | 5,253 mm | 4,806 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 1,938 mm | 1,806 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,786 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,043 kg | 1,480 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 83 L | 70 L | 13 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,034 mm | 986 mm | -985 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,605 mm | 1,468 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,463 mm | 1,387 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,036 mm | 1,059 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 993 mm | 960 mm | 33 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,590 mm | 1,445 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,453 mm | 1,369 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 925 mm | 973 mm | -48 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,961 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,032 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume | 0.0 | 425 L | -425 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Honda Ridgeline
| 2012 Honda Ridgeline Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUT 250-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
I too love that the rearseats can both flip up. This offers me alot of rear floor space to haul my music gear instead of laying it out on the rear bed area. see full Honda Ridgeline review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Toyota Camry
| 2009 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
excellent legroom see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
very comfortable on long and short trips see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
more comfortable than Accord and Nissan see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2009 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 169-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Very noisy at high way speeds. see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
Just could not get comfortable. see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
Front seat comfort is another subjective measurement. Our experience driving our 06 and 08 Accords has been that we feel little discomfort or back pain during long trips. We did have more such problems with our 05 and 06 rentals, although not severe. see full Toyota Camry review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUTs
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
