| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2019 Hyundai Elantra GT and 2015 Acura MDX Specifications
| Model Year | 2019 | 2015 | |
| Model | Hyundai Elantra GT | Acura MDX | |
| Engine | turbocharged 1.6L I4 DOHC-4v 150 kW@6000 264 Nm@1500 |
3.5L V6 OHC-4v 216 kW@6200 362 Nm@4500 |
|
| Transmission | 7-speed automated manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
| Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,649 mm | 2,819 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,341 mm | 4,917 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,781 mm | 1,961 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,466 mm | 1,694 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,391 kg | 1,826 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 53 L | 74 L | -21 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 993 mm | 968 mm | 25 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,427 mm | 1,552 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0 mm | 1,461 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,072 mm | 1,052 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 978 mm | 973 mm | 5 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,407 mm | 1,501 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,468 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 884 mm | 930 mm | -46 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 904 mm | -904 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,389 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,031 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 714 mm | -714 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,956 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,695 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 705 L | 419 L | 286 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 24.9 | 1,087 L | 23.9 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,560 L | 1,937 L | 0 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2019 Hyundai Elantra GT
| 2019 Hyundai Elantra GT Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The front seats are comfortable and supportive in both cars, with Hyundai's likely agreeable for a wider range of body sizes and types. And the rear seat? Here we have another area where the Elantra Touring excelled, but neither Elantra GT has. The culprit this time isn't design, but a decision by those who make the big bucks at the corporate level. Hyundai offers Europeans the i30 (the same car with a different model name) in two lengths. These are marketed as a hatchback and as an estate or touring or tourer or kombi or whatever other label might help sell what Americans call station wagons. With the Elantra Touring, we got the latter, and consequently far more rear seat room and cargo carrying capacity than in any other compact hatchback. But we didn't buy the car. So with the first and second Elantra GT we've been getting the much less lengthy, more athletically proportioned hatchback. As it stands (or rather, sits), the Elantra GT's rear seat shouldn't be condemned as useless unless you're a driver of above-average height with similarly sized passsengers. At 5-9, I fit behind a driver seat set for myself with perhaps three inches between my knees and the seat back and about a half-inch to spare between the top of my head and the headliner (in a two-pedal Elantra GT with the optional sunroof). But people even a couple inches taller than me will feel cramped. The rear seats in the GTI and Civic are roomier. One plus in the Elantra GT's column: its rear seat passengers get air vents. The Civic's don't. In terms of cargo space the Elantra GT is more competitive, but nothing special the way it was with the Elantra Touring. see full Hyundai Elantra GT review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2019 Hyundai Elantra GT
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2019 Hyundai Elantra GT.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Acura MDX
| 2015 Acura MDX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| That's it for the significant advantages of the new Acura MDX. Most things it does well, but not significantly better than the generally good segment averages. It's quick, but not thrillingly so. The front seats are comfortable and supportive, and cushier than those in the Infiniti, but provide less lateral support than those in the smaller Acura RDX and are no match in comfort or support for those in a BMW X5, a Lexus RX, or the big buck Mercedes reviewed a few weeks ago. Ride quality, like the seats, is good but short of luxurious. With additional sound deadening and laminated front door glass, the 2014 MDX is quieter than the 2013, but this only brings it in line with the others. By the same token, there aren't many clear reasons to reject the 2014 MDX. The most obvious follows from its relatively compact size: though (as already mentioned) cargo volume is more than competitive, there's less room in the rearmost row than in the QX60. By sliding the second row up a couple of inches (it has a half-foot of travel), adults of middling size will fit back there. But with their butt low and knees high they won't be comfortable. The QX60 offers far more combined legroom based on the spec sheets, and a couple more inches in the real world. (The Acura's specs seem to under-represent reality for passengers even as they might over-represent it for cargo.) But the Infiniti's seats are flatter and less comfortable. The new Hyundai Santa Fe offers more legroom than the Infiniti, while Ford's large crossovers could be best of all for transporting up to seven adults--if still not as good as the typical minivan. see full Acura MDX review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Acura MDX
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Acura MDX.
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Hyundai models.
