| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee and 2013 BMW 3-Series Specifications
| Model Year | 2007 | 2013 | |
| Model | Jeep Grand Cherokee | BMW 3-Series | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 109.5 in | 110.6 in | -1.1 in |
| Length | 186.6 in | 182.5 in | 4.1 in |
| Width | 73.3 in | 71.3 in | 2 in |
| Height | 67.7 in | 56.3 in | 11.4 in |
| Curb Weight | 4254 lb. | 3360 lb. | 894 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 20.8 gal. | 15.8 gal. | 5 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 39.7 in | 40.3 in | -0.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 59.1 in | 55.1 in | 4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 57.6 in | 0.0 in | 57.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.7 in | 42.0 in | -0.3 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.3 in | 37.7 in | 1.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 58.5 in | 55.1 in | 3.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 60.6 in | 0.0 in | 60.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 35.5 in | 35.1 in | 0.4 in |
| Total Legroom | 77.2 in (over 2 rows) | 77.1 in (over 2 rows) | 0.1 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 34.5 ft3 | 13.0 ft3 | 21.5 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 67.4 ft3 | 13.0 ft3 | 54.4 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee
| 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 215hp 3.0L V6 Diesel 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
small, tight see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 235-horsepower 4.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
That and MPG are the only real faults so far after 15000 miles and 15 mons. I think our 2001 GC has more seat comfort although the 07s seats do fold over easier than the 01s. see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 BMW 3-Series
| 2013 BMW 3-Series Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2014 | The BMW 3-Series used to be tight inside, but it has grown with each redesign, especially the most recent one. The rear seat of the current sedan isn't nearly as roomy as that in the related 3-Series Gran Turismo hatchback. But it offers considerably more rear legroom than direct competitors like the Audi A4, Cadillac ATS, and Mercedes-Benz C-Class. In fact, combined front and rear legroom is the same as in the one size-class up, ten-inch-longer Mercedes E-Class. (You do get a half-inch more rear headroom and nearly two inches more rear shoulder room in the Benz.) Beyond the specs, the BMW's rear seat is comfortably high off the floor, a rarity in the age of sedans with plunging coupe-like roof lines. see full BMW 3-Series review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 BMW 3-Series
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 BMW 3-Series.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Jeep models.
