We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Kia Sportage vs. Cadillac CTS Fuel Economy (g/100m)

Chart is based on 59 fuel economy reports for the Kia Sportage and 133 fuel economy reports for the Cadillac CTS.

Kia Sportage g/100m

Kia Sportage Kia Sportage 2014 10.4 MPG Highway Percentage 0 percent Kia Sportage Kia Sportage 2012 9.9 MPG Highway Percentage 42 percent Kia Sportage Kia Sportage 2012 4.7 MPG Highway Percentage 16 percent Kia Sportage Kia Sportage 2011 4.4 MPG Highway Percentage 18 percent Kia Sportage Kia Sportage 2010 20.0 MPG Highway Percentage 90 percent Kia Sportage Kia Sportage 2009 2.1 MPG Highway Percentage 53 percent Kia Sportage Kia Sportage 2009 4.9 MPG Highway Percentage 39 percent Kia Sportage Kia Sportage 2008 5.2 MPG Highway Percentage 5 percent Kia Sportage Kia Sportage 2008 27.6 MPG Highway Percentage 37 percent Kia Sportage Kia Sportage 2007 14.2 MPG Highway Percentage 24 percent Kia Sportage Kia Sportage 2006 7.2 MPG Highway Percentage 36 percent Kia Sportage Kia Sportage 2006 26.0 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Kia Sportage Kia Sportage 2006 3.4 MPG Highway Percentage 58 percent Kia Sportage Kia Sportage 2005.5 22.9 MPG Highway Percentage 22 percent Kia Sportage Kia Sportage 2005 23.8 MPG Highway Percentage 20 percent Kia Sportage Kia Sportage 2005 5.7 MPG Highway Percentage 90 percent Kia Sportage Kia Sportage 2001 4.9 MPG Highway Percentage 96 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd g/100m
2014 4dr SUV 182-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
hills med none 0 0 100 0 10.4  
2012 4dr SUV turbocharged 260hp 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
hills med light 10 10 38 42 80 9.9  
2012 4dr SUV 176-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
flat light hvy 0 2 82 16 68 4.7  
2011 4dr SUV 176-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
flat med light 8 28 48 18 68 4.4  
2010 4dr SUV turbocharged 147hp 2.0L I4 Diesel
4-speed shiftable automatic FWD
mtns med hvy 0 10 0 90 110 20.0  
2009 4dr SUV turbocharged 140hp 2.0L I4 Diesel
6-speed manual FWD
flat light light 14 0 33 53 60 2.1  
2009 4dr SUV 173-horsepower 2.7L V6
4-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat light light 0 28 33 39 60 4.9  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2008 4dr SUV 173-horsepower 2.7L V6
4-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat light none 25 50 20 5 60 5.2  
2008 4dr SUV 140-horsepower 2.0L I4
4-speed shiftable automatic FWD
flat light none 0 0 63 37 119 27.6  
2007 4dr SUV 173-horsepower 2.7L V6
4-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat light light 5 26 45 24 89 14.2  
2006 4dr SUV 173-horsepower 2.7L V6
4-speed shiftable automatic FWD
flat light hvy 18 13 33 36 70 7.2  
2006 4dr SUV 173-horsepower 2.7L V6
4-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat med light 8 49 3 40 95 26.0  
2006 4dr SUV 140-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 4 9 29 58 75 3.4  
2005.5 4dr SUV 140-horsepower 2.0L I4
4-speed shiftable automatic FWD
flat light none 25 28 25 22 120 22.9  
2005 4dr SUV turbocharged 111hp 2.0L I4 Diesel
5-speed manual AWD
flat light light 10 40 30 20 120 23.8  
2005 4dr SUV 173-horsepower 2.7L V6
4-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat light light 0 5 5 90 70 5.7  
2001 4dr SUV 130-horsepower 2.0L I4
4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat light none 0 4 0 96 60 4.9  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Kia Sportage fuel economy data.

Cadillac CTS g/100m

Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2016 4.5 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2011 21.1 MPG Highway Percentage 23 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2010 4.3 MPG Highway Percentage 93 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2010 6.5 MPG Highway Percentage 34 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2010 3.9 MPG Highway Percentage 100 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2009 6.7 MPG Highway Percentage 44 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2009 7.6 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2009 4.5 MPG Highway Percentage 53 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2009 5.1 MPG Highway Percentage 37 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2008 5.2 MPG Highway Percentage 24 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2008 5.1 MPG Highway Percentage 31 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2008 4.5 MPG Highway Percentage 53 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2008 4.3 MPG Highway Percentage 74 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2008 5.2 MPG Highway Percentage 17 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2007 5.0 MPG Highway Percentage 78 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2007 5.1 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2006 5.4 MPG Highway Percentage 35 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2006 4.8 MPG Highway Percentage 60 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2006 9.8 MPG Highway Percentage 72 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2006 32.9 MPG Highway Percentage 25 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2006 5.2 MPG Highway Percentage 23 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2005 5.0 MPG Highway Percentage 57 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2005 5.0 MPG Highway Percentage 48 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2005 6.0 MPG Highway Percentage 47 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2004 4.9 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2004 4.7 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2004 3.9 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2003 12.3 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd g/100m
2016 4dr Sedan turbocharged 268hp 2.0L I4
8-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat med light 0 0 60 40 70 4.5  
2011 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat med hvy 23 40 13 23 83 21.1  
2010 4dr Wagon 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
hills light light 0 5 2 93 60 4.3  
2010 4dr Wagon 270-horsepower 3.0L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat v.lt none 0 64 3 34 70 6.5  
2010 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat light none 0 0 0 100 70 3.9  
2009 4dr Sedan supercharged 556hp 6.2L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
hills lead light 10 8 39 44 62 6.7  
2009 4dr Sedan supercharged 556hp 6.2L V8
6-speed manual RWD
hills lead light 5 5 35 55 65 7.6  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2009 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
hills med hvy 11 16 21 53 71 4.5  
2009 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat med light 3 18 42 37 57 5.1  
2008 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat light light 10 32 34 24 72 5.2  
2008 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat med none 4 23 42 31 70 5.1  
2008 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed manual RWD
hills med light 8 25 15 53 75 4.5  
2008 4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat light none 1 6 19 74 70 4.3  
2008 4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
hills med light 0 0 83 17 70 5.2  
2007 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat light light 4 9 9 78 71 5.0  
2007 4dr Sedan 210-horsepower 2.8L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
mtns lead light 0 0 70 30 60 5.1  
2006 4dr Sedan 400-horsepower 6.0L V8
6-speed manual RWD
flat med hvy 15 50 0 35 70 5.4  
2006 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed manual RWD
flat lead light 25 10 5 60 85 4.8  
2006 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat med light 7 11 11 72 80 9.8  
2006 4dr Sedan 210-horsepower 2.8L V6
6-speed manual RWD
flat light none 5 20 50 25 100 32.9  
2006 4dr Sedan 210-horsepower 2.8L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat med light 7 20 50 23 67 5.2  
2005 4dr Sedan 400-horsepower 5.7L V8
6-speed manual RWD
flat med light 7 13 24 57 69 5.0  
2005 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed manual RWD
flat med none 2 15 35 48 60 5.0  
2005 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
flat med light 8 12 33 47 69 6.0  
2004 4dr Sedan 400-horsepower 5.7L V8
6-speed manual RWD
flat med light 0 0 30 70 67 4.9  
2004 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
flat med none 7 25 24 45 66 4.7  
2004 4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.2L V6
5-speed manual RWD
flat med light 10 10 0 80 70 3.9  
2003 4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.2L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
flat med light 10 17 33 40 91 12.3  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Cadillac CTS fuel economy data.

Kia Sportage vs. Cadillac CTS Fuel Economy (g/100m)

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Kia Sportage and Cadillac CTS's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world g/100m based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Kia models and Cadillac models.

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Kia Sportage

Kia Sportage Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2012 4dr SUV turbocharged 260hp 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
Better fuel economy than my BMW. see full Kia Sportage review
2009 4dr SUV 140-horsepower 2.0L I4
4-speed shiftable automatic FWD
If it achieves the posted estimates I will be happy. Too new to rate personally. see full Kia Sportage review
Kia Sportage Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2012 4dr SUV 176-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
Many people probably decided on a Kia, and specifically a Sportage over other makes and models because of the advertised fuel economy numbers. Since day one, this vehicle ALWAYS, I want to stress ALWAYS, underachieves advertised mpg numbers. Took 2 round trips that were 360 miles one way, ALL highway, and best mpg were 26.2. That is 6 mpg LESS than advertised, and even with new EPA ratings, still 4 less. When driving a combination of 1/2 highway, 1/2 suburbs, attain 21-23 mpg which is less than "combined" mpg rating. Haven't driven an entire tank of city driving, but after measuring MPG for mostly suburb driving, get 17-19 mpg which is 3-5 mpg less than advertised city rating. Horrible. see full Kia Sportage review
2008 4dr SUV 140-horsepower 2.0L I4
4-speed shiftable automatic FWD
In winter ans extremely low temperature tjhe fuell consumption reaches 15 liter per 100 kilometer. Minimum in summer was 8.4 liter per 100 km see full Kia Sportage review
 

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Cadillac CTS

Cadillac CTS Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearComment
With the 2011 528i, BMW pioneered the use of a turbocharged four-cylinder engine in a $60,000 midsize sedan on this side of the Atlantic. The point: fuel economy, specifically EPA ratings of 22 mpg city and 33 mpg highway even with all-wheel-drive (24/34 with RWD). Audi followed with an A6 2.0T good for 20/29 (25/33 with FWD) a year later. The new CTS takes the path blazed by the Germans, but much less effectively. Though the Cadillac weighs significantly less than the Audi or the BMW, its EPA ratings are lower, 19/28 (20/30 with RWD). The same is the case with the two 3.6-liter V6 engine options, even though unlike the turbo four they can be paired with an eight-speed (instead of a six-speed) automatic. The rear-drive-only Vsport barely evades the gas guzzler tax with ratings of 16/24. Even the 445-horsepower turbocharged 4.4-liter V8 in the BMW 550i does a bit better. In my real-world driving, the CTS's trip computer confirmed this shortcoming. Even considering that the outside temperature was near zero, post-warm-up averages that clustered around 18 were disappointing. Only by driving the car with a light foot could I nudge the suburban average over 20, and even then not much over. A 320-horsepower 3.0-liter 640i Grand Coupe tested a week earlier in similar conditions did at least one mpg better than the 272-horsepower, 2.0-liter Cadillac. And when I tested a 528i xDrive in slightly warmer temps it often managed 25 mpg (in an EcoPro Mode the Cadillac lacks). In one trip this BMW even touched 30. see full Cadillac CTS review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Cadillac CTS

Cadillac CTS Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2008 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
fill for $50 on reg. today that is cheap see full Cadillac CTS review
2008 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
23 cty & 26 hwy need i say more see full Cadillac CTS review
2008 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
Averaging 25.5 on the highway. see full Cadillac CTS review
2003 4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.2L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
The fuel economy is better than expected, when driven in mixed city/highway driving. see full Cadillac CTS review
2003 4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.2L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
I get 25 miles per gallon - mostly highway driving - which is reasonable for a car of this size and performance. see full Cadillac CTS review
2003 4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.2L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
about 26 mpg is great....im use to driving a suv where im luckey to get 16mpg highway see full Cadillac CTS review
Cadillac CTS Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2009 4dr Sedan supercharged 556hp 6.2L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
14mpg is not great. However, the performance makes more than up for it. see full Cadillac CTS review
2008 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
City mileage acceptable; Highway mileage could be better. see full Cadillac CTS review
2005 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
I get 20-21mpg on my commute which is about 70%hwy, and normally 25-27 with pure freeway driving, it just seems with technology today they could kick that up to 23-24 and 28-30 respectively. see full Cadillac CTS review
2004 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
Average at best. Yea it is a heavy car with all the safety eqipment. see full Cadillac CTS review