MENU
1 0 3 4 3 4

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque vs. Ford C-MAX MPG

Chart is based on 4 fuel economy reports for the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and 179 fuel economy reports for the Ford C-MAX.

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque MPG

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 29.4 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 31.0 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 24.0 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2015 4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.0L I4
9-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat lead light 0 20 0 80 80 29.4  
2015 4dr SUV turbocharged 190hp 2.2L I4 Diesel
9-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat med light 5 0 15 80 70 31.0  
2013 4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat light none 0 25 25 50 65 24.0  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque fuel economy data.

Ford C-MAX MPG

Ford C-MAX Ford C-MAX 2017 34.8 MPG Highway Percentage 47 percent Ford C-MAX Ford C-MAX 2015 44.4 MPG Highway Percentage 19 percent Ford C-MAX Ford C-MAX 2014 72.2 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Ford C-MAX Ford C-MAX 2013 63.0 MPG Highway Percentage 21 percent Ford C-MAX Ford C-MAX 2013 43.1 MPG Highway Percentage 46 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2017 4dr Hatch 141-horsepower 2.0L I4 Hybrid
CVT FWD		 flat light none 0 0 53 47 69 34.8  
2015 4dr Hatch 141-horsepower 2.0L I4 Hybrid
CVT FWD		 flat light light 24 37 21 19 66 44.4  
2014 4dr Hatch 141-horsepower 2.0L I4 Plug-in Hybrid
CVT FWD		 flat light none 0 20 30 50 65 72.2  
2013 4dr Hatch 141-horsepower 2.0L I4 Plug-in Hybrid
CVT FWD		 flat light light 17 21 42 21 70 63.0  
2013 4dr Hatch 141-horsepower 2.0L I4 Hybrid
CVT FWD		 flat light light 1 18 35 46 63 43.1  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Ford C-MAX fuel economy data.

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque vs. Ford C-MAX MPG

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and Ford C-MAX's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world MPG based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Land Rover models and Ford models.

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2012 4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 I live in San Francisco and am always driving up and down the hills so my mileage is not at all 'normal' but I still manage to squeak out about 15-16 around town. Driving out of town (but not highway) I get about 20-22. Have not yet driven very much highway but I expect it will be good. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the 2001 Ford C-MAX

None of our members have yet commented on the real gas mileage of the 2001 Ford C-MAX.

Be the first!