Land Rover Range Rover Evoque (2013) vs. Ford Mustang (2006) Specs

vs.

◆

2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and 2006 Ford Mustang Specifications

Model Year	2013	2006
Model	Land Rover Range Rover Evoque	Ford Mustang
Engine
Transmission
Drivetrain
Body	4dr SUV	2dr Coupe
			Difference
Wheelbase	104.8 in	107.1 in	-2.3 in
Length	171.5 in	187.6 in	-16.1 in
Width	77.4 in	73.9 in	3.5 in
Height	64.4 in	55.4 in	9 in
Curb Weight	3680 lb.	3373 lb.	307 lb.
Fuel Capacity	18.5 gal.	16.0 gal.	2.5 gal.
Headroom, Row 1	40.3 in	38.6 in	1.7 in
Shoulder Room, Row 1	56.6 in	55.4 in	1.2 in
Hip Room, Row 1	0.0 in	53.6 in	-53.6 in
Legroom, Row 1	43.1 in	42.7 in	0.4 in
Headroom, Row 2	39.7 in	34.7 in	5 in
Shoulder Room, Row 2	55.4 in	53.4 in	2 in
Hip Room, Row 2	0.0 in	46.8 in	-46.8 in
Legroom, Row 2	35.7 in	30.3 in	5.4 in
Total Legroom	78.8 in (over 2 rows)	73 in (over 2 rows)	5.8 in
Cargo Volume, Minimum	20.3 ft³	13.1 ft³	7.2 ft³
Cargo Volume, Maximum	51.0 ft³	13.1 ft³	37.9 ft³

2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Comment
	When I first drove an Evoque, I found its front seats cushier and more comfortable than those in the X1. But that was for a short test drive. With more seat time later, the seat felt overly firm beneath my bum and the left seat cushion bolster pressed uncomfortably into my thigh. We're all shaped differently, and we sit differently as well, so your impressions may vary. As with any car, try to get as much seat time as you can before buying--few things are harder than seat comfort to evaluate during a test drive. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review

2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2012	4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.0L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	Astonishingly, the rear seats in this small SUV seat two six footers (and another, smaller middle passenger) very comfortably. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review

2006 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2006	2dr Convertible 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD	seat is comfortable can be adjusted to suit your choice of position all controls are within easy reach see full Ford Mustang review
2005	2dr Convertible 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	Driving position is very flexible, all the controls are within reach and easy to use. see full Ford Mustang review
2005	2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	Plenty of leg room for tall people like me. see full Ford Mustang review

2006 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2007	2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD	While our present government may blow off the standards & principles of the Geneva Convention, I still find them worthy enough to abide. Mustang rear seats are in clear violation. see full Ford Mustang review
2005	2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD	The Mustang is a cool car, but nowhere near as comfortable see full Ford Mustang review
2005	2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD	Not much room in the back of a Mustang... see full Ford Mustang review
2005	2dr Coupe 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed manual RWD	Rear seat is small for adults. see full Ford Mustang review
2005	2dr Convertible 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD	Rear seat is for kids. see full Ford Mustang review
2005	2dr Convertible 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD	Rear seats in name only. No real passenger room see full Ford Mustang review

See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs and Convertibles.

See TrueDelta's information for all Land Rover models.