Land Rover Range Rover Evoque (2013) vs. Ford Mustang (2014) Specs

vs.

◆

2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and 2014 Ford Mustang Specifications

Model Year	2013	2014
Model	Land Rover Range Rover Evoque	Ford Mustang
Engine
Transmission
Drivetrain
Body	4dr SUV	2dr Coupe
			Difference
Wheelbase	104.8 in	107.1 in	-2.3 in
Length	171.5 in	188.5 in	-17 in
Width	77.4 in	73.9 in	3.5 in
Height	64.4 in	55.8 in	8.6 in
Curb Weight	3680 lb.	3501 lb.	179 lb.
Fuel Capacity	18.5 gal.	16.0 gal.	2.5 gal.
Headroom, Row 1	40.3 in	38.5 in	1.8 in
Shoulder Room, Row 1	56.6 in	55.3 in	1.3 in
Hip Room, Row 1	0.0 in	53.4 in	-53.4 in
Legroom, Row 1	43.1 in	42.4 in	0.7 in
Headroom, Row 2	39.7 in	34.7 in	5 in
Shoulder Room, Row 2	55.4 in	47.8 in	7.6 in
Hip Room, Row 2	0.0 in	46.8 in	-46.8 in
Legroom, Row 2	35.7 in	29.8 in	5.9 in
Total Legroom	78.8 in (over 2 rows)	72.2 in (over 2 rows)	6.6 in
Cargo Volume, Minimum	20.3 ft³	13.4 ft³	6.9 ft³
Cargo Volume, Maximum	51.0 ft³	13.4 ft³	37.6 ft³

2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Comment
	When I first drove an Evoque, I found its front seats cushier and more comfortable than those in the X1. But that was for a short test drive. With more seat time later, the seat felt overly firm beneath my bum and the left seat cushion bolster pressed uncomfortably into my thigh. We're all shaped differently, and we sit differently as well, so your impressions may vary. As with any car, try to get as much seat time as you can before buying--few things are harder than seat comfort to evaluate during a test drive. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review

2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2012	4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.0L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	Astonishingly, the rear seats in this small SUV seat two six footers (and another, smaller middle passenger) very comfortably. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review

2014 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Comment
	This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review

2014 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2013	2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed manual RWD	Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather. see full Ford Mustang review

See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs and Convertibles.

See TrueDelta's information for all Land Rover models.