| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Mazda CX-9 and 2012 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2012 | |
| Model | Mazda CX-9 | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 113.2 in | 107.1 in | 6.1 in |
| Length | 200.2 in | 188.1 in | 12.1 in |
| Width | 76.2 in | 73.9 in | 2.3 in |
| Height | 68.0 in | 55.6 in | 12.4 in |
| Curb Weight | 4330 lb. | 3447 lb. | 883 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 20.1 gal. | 16.0 gal. | 4.1 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 39.6 in | 38.5 in | 1.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 59.4 in | 55.3 in | 4.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 56.5 in | 53.4 in | 3.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 40.9 in | 42.4 in | -1.5 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.0 in | 34.7 in | 4.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 58.7 in | 51.6 in | 7.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 56.0 in | 46.8 in | 9.2 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 39.8 in | 29.8 in | 10 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 35.4 in | 0.0 in | 35.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 56.9 in | 0.0 in | 56.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 43.7 in | 0.0 in | 43.7 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 32.4 in | 0.0 in | 32.4 in |
| Total Legroom | 113.1 in (over 3 rows) | 72.2 in (over 2 rows) | 40.9 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 17.2 ft3 | 13.4 ft3 | 3.8 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 48.3 ft3 | 13.4 | 34.9 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 100.7 ft3 | 13.4 ft3 | 87.3 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Mazda CX-9
| 2011 Mazda CX-9 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat hugs in the right places without being cumbersome. Headrest position is much better than the midsize GM vehicles I test-drove (Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, Buick Enclave). see full Mazda CX-9 review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Ford Mustang
| 2012 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2012 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 2dr Coupe 305-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
My dad's 2010 Camaro has much more legroom than my Mustang. 2 more inches would help a lot, though I have to admit even at 6-3, I'm still pretty comfy in the Mustang. The room would be nice to have on trips. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2011 | 2dr Coupe 305-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
Felt like seating position was "on the floor". Steering wheel had only tilt adjustment, no telescope. see full Ford Mustang review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Mazda models.
