| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Mazda CX-9 and 2012 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2012 | |
| Model | Mazda CX-9 | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,875 mm | 2,720 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 5,085 mm | 4,778 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 1,935 mm | 1,877 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,727 mm | 1,412 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,964 kg | 1,564 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 76 L | 61 L | 15 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,006 mm | 978 mm | -977 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,509 mm | 1,405 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,435 mm | 1,356 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,039 mm | 1,077 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 881 mm | 110 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,491 mm | 1,311 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,422 mm | 1,189 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,011 mm | 757 mm | -756 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 899 mm | 0 mm | 899 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,445 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,110 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 823 mm | 0 mm | 823 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,873 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,834 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 487 L | 379 L | 108 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,368 L | 13.4 | -12.4 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,852 L | 13.4 | -11.4 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Mazda CX-9
| 2011 Mazda CX-9 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat hugs in the right places without being cumbersome. Headrest position is much better than the midsize GM vehicles I test-drove (Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, Buick Enclave). see full Mazda CX-9 review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Ford Mustang
| 2012 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2012 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 2dr Coupe 305-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
My dad's 2010 Camaro has much more legroom than my Mustang. 2 more inches would help a lot, though I have to admit even at 6-3, I'm still pretty comfy in the Mustang. The room would be nice to have on trips. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2011 | 2dr Coupe 305-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
Felt like seating position was "on the floor". Steering wheel had only tilt adjustment, no telescope. see full Ford Mustang review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Mazda models.
