| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Mazda CX-9 and 2016 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2016 | |
| Model | Mazda CX-9 | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,875 mm | 2,720 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 5,085 mm | 4,783 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 1,935 mm | 1,915 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,727 mm | 1,382 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,964 kg | 1,599 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 76 L | 61 L | 15 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,006 mm | 955 mm | -954 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,509 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,435 mm | 1,394 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,039 mm | 1,067 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 884 mm | 107 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,491 mm | 1,326 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,422 mm | 1,204 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,011 mm | 777 mm | -776 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 899 mm | 0 mm | 899 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,445 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,110 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 823 mm | 0 mm | 823 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,873 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,844 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 487 L | 382 L | 105 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,368 L | 13.5 | -12.5 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,852 L | 13.5 | -11.5 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Mazda CX-9
| 2011 Mazda CX-9 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat hugs in the right places without being cumbersome. Headrest position is much better than the midsize GM vehicles I test-drove (Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, Buick Enclave). see full Mazda CX-9 review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
| 2016 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Mazda models.
