| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Mazda Mazda2 and 2018 Mazda CX-5 Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2018 | |
| Model | Mazda Mazda2 | Mazda CX-5 | |
| Engine | 1.5L I4 DOHC-4v 100 hp@6000 98 lb-ft@4000 |
2.5L I4 DOHC-4v 187 hp@6000 186 lb-ft@4000 |
|
| Transmission | 4-speed automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
| Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,489 mm | 2,697 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 3,950 mm | 4,549 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,694 mm | 1,842 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,476 mm | 1,659 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,070 kg | 1,616 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 43 L | 56 L | -13 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 993 mm | 1,008 mm | 992 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,341 mm | 1,450 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,293 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,069 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 940 mm | 991 mm | -51 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,300 mm | 1,392 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,189 mm | 1,405 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 884 mm | 1,006 mm | 883 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,953 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,047 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 377 L | 875 L | -498 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 765 L | 1,688 L | 764 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Mazda Mazda2
| 2012 Mazda Mazda2 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 100-horsepower 1.5L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
Adequate, but no more, for a large 6 footer. see full Mazda Mazda2 review |
| 2012 Mazda Mazda2 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 100-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The rear seats are pretty good but the headrests are poorly executed. They either poke the passenger in the back or put their head in an uncomfortable position. see full Mazda Mazda2 review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-5
| 2018 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-5
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-5.
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks and Sedans.
See TrueDelta's information for all Mazda models.
