

Page 1 of 1 | ||
Page 1 of 1 |
2 comments |
2015 Mercedes-Benz C400 Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh Rear legroom in the Mercedes-Benz C-Class increased by almost two inches for 2015, such that it nearly ties the best-in-class BMW. Unlike in the tighter Cadillac ATS, one average-sized man can sit behind another with some room to spare. The Mercedes-Benz's trunk is about average is size. The BMW's... Comparison vehicle: 2013 Cadillac ATS |
2010 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Pros and Cons Member5056 This car has a very small back seat. If you want to carry passengers for a long distance, get an E class. |
|
2012 BMW 328i Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh Another surprising strength for the new BMW 3-Series. There's more room in back than in competing cars, and the seat is comfortably positioned and shaped. Comparison vehicle: 2012 Mercedes-Benz C-Class |
|
2009 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Pros and Cons Member2788 Not much leg room when compared to other luxury entries. No flat floor so a 3rd passenger in the rear is not possible. |
|
2006 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Pros and Cons Member3562 There is no rear seat room. |
|
Looking to trade in your vehicle? Get an estimate of how much it's worth.
| |
2006 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Pros and Cons A member in Western Australia, Australia Rear seats are narrow and hard. The centre seat is only usable for very small people on very short trips. |
|
2002 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Pros and Cons A member in Michigan, United States supportive up front, average in back |
|
2008 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Pros and Cons A member in Connecticut, United States just ok |
|
2008 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Pros and Cons A member in Egypt too tight back there. |
|
2008 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Pros and Cons Member2054 |
|
2006 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Pros and Cons A member in Georgia, United States |