Mercedes-Benz E-Class (2007) vs. Jaguar XF (2017) Specs

vs.

◆

2007 Mercedes-Benz E-Class and 2017 Jaguar XF Specifications

Model Year	2007	2017
Model	Mercedes-Benz E-Class	Jaguar XF
Engine	turbocharged 3.0L V6 Diesel DOHC-4v 208 hp@3800 400 lb-ft@1600	turbocharged 2.0L I4 Diesel DOHC-4v 180 hp@4000 318 lb-ft@1750
Transmission	7-speed shiftable automatic	8-speed shiftable automatic
Drivetrain	RWD	RWD
Body	4dr Sedan	4dr Sedan
			Difference
Wheelbase	112.4 in	116.5 in	-4.1 in
Length	191.0 in	195.0 in	-4 in
Width	71.7 in	74.0 in	-2.3 in
Height	58.4 in	57.4 in	1 in
Curb Weight	3872 lb.	3520 lb.	352 lb.
Fuel Capacity	21.1 gal.	19.5 gal.	1.6 gal.
Headroom, Row 1	39.1 in	37.5 in	1.6 in
Shoulder Room, Row 1	56.4 in	57.0 in	-0.6 in
Hip Room, Row 1	52.4 in	0.0 in	52.4 in
Legroom, Row 1	41.9 in	44.4 in	-2.5 in
Headroom, Row 2	37.8 in	38.1 in	-0.3 in
Shoulder Room, Row 2	56.1 in	54.9 in	1.2 in
Hip Room, Row 2	53.8 in	0.0 in	53.8 in
Legroom, Row 2	35.6 in	37.2 in	-1.6 in
Total Legroom	77.5 in (over 2 rows)	81.6 in (over 2 rows)	-4.1 in
Cargo Volume	15.9 ft³	19.1 ft³	-3.2 ft³

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2007 Mercedes-Benz E-Class

2007 Mercedes-Benz E-Class Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2008	4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD	Driving 4-5 hours in a row left no fatigue or discomfort in my back or legs. The seats are just firm enough but very supportive where they need to be. see full Mercedes-Benz E-Class review
2008	4dr Sedan turbocharged 210hp 3.0L V6 Diesel 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD	Can spend all day driving this car and not be exhausted. see full Mercedes-Benz E-Class review
2008	4dr Sedan 382-horsepower 5.5L V8 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD	The most comfortable seats among all its rivals including Lexus, Jaguar, BMW, Audi, and Infiniti. Plenty of adjustments in the seat and the telescoping steering wheel. Plenty of front seat room for people 6 foot tall and more. Provides ample support. see full Mercedes-Benz E-Class review
2008	4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD	Much better sized for me. My prior 2007 three series BMW was too small and cramped. see full Mercedes-Benz E-Class review
2007	4dr Sedan 507-horsepower 6.2L V8 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD	Lots of room and has adjustments on multicontour seats. see full Mercedes-Benz E-Class review
2007	4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD	Very comfortable, firm seating,even after very long drives. The combination of lumbar support and heat leaves me refreshed after eight- and nine-hour drives. see full Mercedes-Benz E-Class review
2006	4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD	I could fall asleep in this thing. Great seat heaters and adjustability. see full Mercedes-Benz E-Class review

2007 Mercedes-Benz E-Class Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2008	4dr Sedan 382-horsepower 5.5L V8 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD	The back seat is very comfortable and provides good headroom and seating support. They fold down to provide additional storage room. My complaint is that it is not S class roomy in the back. Leg and foot room can be limited if sitting behind a tall driver see full Mercedes-Benz E-Class review

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Jaguar XF

2017 Jaguar XF Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year	Comment
2016	And space? The real magic: the new Jaguar XF combines a sleek, sporty body with a usefully roomy and comfortable rear seat. There's more rear knee room than in the BMW 5-Series, and even than in the larger regular wheelbase Jaguar XJ. (For buyers who need even more legroom, Jaguar also offers an extended wheelbase version of the XJ.) If you compare the XF to German cars with at least equally sporty styling, it has a much roomier rear seat. The BMW 6-Series Gran Coupe, though a couple inches longer than the XF, has a cramped, uncomfortably positioned rear seat. The Mercedes CLS does better in its second-generation form, but still doesn't compare to the new XF in this regard. The Cadillac CTS, though its profile is very much that of a sedan, also has a tighter rear seat than the XF. For a combination of coupe-like styling, agile handling, and rear seat room, the new XF can't be beat. But wait, there's more. Even though it retains a spare tire (BMW and Cadillac have tossed theirs), the new XF also has the roomiest trunk in the class--over 19 cubic feet. But the XF isn't offered as a hatchback or wagon. The Audi A7 hatchback remains the versatility champ among sporty midsize luxury cars. The other thing keeping the XF from being the utility champ of its class: the center console storage area is barely there. see full Jaguar XF review

2017 Jaguar XF Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Comment
	Continuing my interior nitpicking, I'll add that the new Jaguar XF's seats provide acceptable support and comfort, but the seats in some competitors are exceptional. Jaguar lags here. It might help to step up to the 380-horsepower XF S (which actually costs a little less than the tested 340-horsepower R-Sport), as its seats include power adjustments for the side bolsters and cushion length. The rear seat, though usefully roomy, is also on the firm side. On a positive note, the XF's driving position is very good. The instrument panel isn't overly large or imposing, and the windows are reasonably large and are not too steeply raked. Outward visibility is at least as good as that in the BMW 5 Series and much better than in the scrunched down 6 Series Grand Coupe. see full Jaguar XF review

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Jaguar XF

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Jaguar XF.

Be the first!

See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans, Wagons, Coupes, and Convertibles.

See TrueDelta's information for all Mercedes-Benz models.