| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2009 Mercury Milan and 2016 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2009 | 2016 | |
| Model | Mercury Milan | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 107.4 in | 107.1 in | 0.3 in |
| Length | 190.2 in | 188.3 in | 1.9 in |
| Width | 72.2 in | 75.4 in | -3.2 in |
| Height | 55.8 in | 54.4 in | 1.4 in |
| Curb Weight | 3117 lb. | 3526 lb. | -409 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 18.0 gal. | 16.0 gal. | 2 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.7 in | 37.6 in | 1.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 57.4 in | 56.3 in | 1.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 54.0 in | 54.9 in | -0.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.3 in | 42.0 in | 0.3 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 37.8 in | 34.8 in | 3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 56.5 in | 52.2 in | 4.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 53.3 in | 47.4 in | 5.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 37.0 in | 30.6 in | 6.4 in |
| Total Legroom | 79.3 in (over 2 rows) | 72.6 in (over 2 rows) | 6.7 in |
| Cargo Volume | 15.8 ft3 | 13.5 ft3 | 2.3 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Mercury Milan
| 2009 Mercury Milan Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 160-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
I needed to fit 3 child car seats in the back, which it does better than my VW Passat it replaced. see full Mercury Milan review |
| 2009 Mercury Milan Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 160-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
My head was squashed into the roof. Could not adjust seat to find a tolerable position. see full Mercury Milan review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 160-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
I felt very constrained in all movements. see full Mercury Milan review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
| 2016 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang.
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Mercury models.
