We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Mitsubishi Lancer vs. BMW X3 Fuel Economy (L/100km)

Chart is based on 90 fuel economy reports for the Mitsubishi Lancer and 79 fuel economy reports for the BMW X3.

Mitsubishi Lancer L/100km

Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2014 11.1 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 12.4 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 11.4 MPG Highway Percentage 60 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 8.1 MPG Highway Percentage 65 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 8.9 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 11.8 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 11.1 MPG Highway Percentage 16 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 9.3 MPG Highway Percentage 33 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 7.5 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 9.3 MPG Highway Percentage 59 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 8.5 MPG Highway Percentage 41 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 10.1 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 9.5 MPG Highway Percentage 43 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 8.1 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 8.5 MPG Highway Percentage 0 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 7.9 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 11.2 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 8.1 MPG Highway Percentage 56 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 9.4 MPG Highway Percentage 59 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 7.3 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 10.9 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 10.2 MPG Highway Percentage 63 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 9.4 MPG Highway Percentage 57 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 7.0 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2005 11.2 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2005 10.7 MPG Highway Percentage 95 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2005 10.6 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2003 10.0 MPG Highway Percentage 88 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2003 8.7 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2002 9.0 MPG Highway Percentage 37 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2002 8.3 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd L/100km
2014 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
flat med none 0 0 60 40 65 11.1  
2011 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD
flat med hvy 15 0 10 75 70 12.4  
2011 4dr Sedan turbocharged 237hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD
flat med none 30 5 5 60 75 11.4  
2011 4dr Sedan 148-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat med light 5 20 10 65 63 8.1  
2011 4dr Hatch 148-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat med light 25 20 25 30 75 8.9  
2010 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD
flat med none 5 15 40 40 75 11.8  
2010 4dr Sedan turbocharged 237hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD
flat med light 19 16 49 16 110 11.1  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat med none 10 21 36 33 67 9.3  
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light none 10 10 0 80 100 7.5  
2010 4dr Hatch 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat med light 0 3 38 59 70 9.3  
2010 4dr Hatch 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
hills med none 6 12 41 41 120 8.5  
2009 4dr Sedan turbocharged 237hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD
flat med light 6 6 34 55 70 10.1  
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat lead none 14 21 22 43 76 9.5  
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 10 21 23 45 88 8.1  
2009 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
CVT FWD
flat light hvy 20 50 30 0 0 8.5  
2009 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 7 17 1 75 103 7.9  
2008 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
flat med light 7 20 33 40 83 11.2  
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
CVT FWD
hills med none 10 21 14 56 80 8.1  
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat light none 7 24 10 59 86 9.4  
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light none 0 0 20 80 70 7.3  
2006 4dr Sedan turbocharged 286hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual AWD
flat med none 19 8 23 50 74 10.9  
2006 4dr Sedan turbocharged 286hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
flat light none 5 28 5 63 60 10.2  
2006 4dr Sedan 162-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat med none 16 16 12 57 79 9.4  
2006 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light hvy 0 20 0 80 70 7.0  
2005 4dr Sedan turbocharged 276hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual AWD
flat light none 15 5 40 40 60 11.2  
2005 4dr Sedan turbocharged 276hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
flat lead none 5 0 0 95 60 10.7  
2005 4dr Sedan 162-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 5 10 10 75 100 10.6  
2003 4dr Sedan turbocharged 271hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
flat med light 1 4 8 88 70 10.0  
2003 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 0 25 0 75 65 8.7  
2002 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light none 7 19 37 37 55 9.0  
2002 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat light light 18 13 25 45 65 8.3  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Mitsubishi Lancer fuel economy data.

BMW X3 L/100km

BMW X3 BMW X3 2014 9.2 MPG Highway Percentage 85 percent BMW X3 BMW X3 2014 7.4 MPG Highway Percentage 25 percent BMW X3 BMW X3 2013 12.0 MPG Highway Percentage 24 percent BMW X3 BMW X3 2012 8.8 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent BMW X3 BMW X3 2011 10.4 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent BMW X3 BMW X3 2011 9.7 MPG Highway Percentage 60 percent BMW X3 BMW X3 2009 11.2 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent BMW X3 BMW X3 2008 11.4 MPG Highway Percentage 51 percent BMW X3 BMW X3 2008 11.2 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent BMW X3 BMW X3 2007 11.8 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent BMW X3 BMW X3 2007 11.7 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent BMW X3 BMW X3 2006 12.3 MPG Highway Percentage 34 percent BMW X3 BMW X3 2005 14.1 MPG Highway Percentage 36 percent BMW X3 BMW X3 2005 10.5 MPG Highway Percentage 56 percent BMW X3 BMW X3 2005 11.9 MPG Highway Percentage 59 percent BMW X3 BMW X3 2004 11.5 MPG Highway Percentage 62 percent BMW X3 BMW X3 2004 10.4 MPG Highway Percentage 49 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd L/100km
2014 4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.0L I4
8-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat light none 5 10 0 85 70 9.2  
2014 4dr SUV turbocharged 180hp 2.0L I4 Diesel
8-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat v.lt light 17 50 8 25 90 7.4  
2013 4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.0L I4
8-speed shiftable automatic AWD
hills med light 17 39 20 24 58 12.0  
2012 4dr SUV 240-horsepower 3.0L I6
8-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat light light 2 20 3 75 70 8.8  
2011 4dr SUV turbocharged 300hp 3.0L I6
8-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat med hvy 30 10 20 40 70 10.4  
2011 4dr SUV 240-horsepower 3.0L I6
8-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat med none 0 30 10 60 74 9.7  
2009 4dr SUV 260-horsepower 3.0L I6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat light light 10 10 50 30 75 11.2  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2008 4dr SUV 260-horsepower 3.0L I6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat med light 13 13 24 51 74 11.4  
2008 4dr SUV 260-horsepower 3.0L I6
6-speed manual AWD
hills med light 0 10 20 70 65 11.2  
2007 4dr SUV 260-horsepower 3.0L I6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat med light 11 23 11 55 69 11.8  
2007 4dr SUV 260-horsepower 3.0L I6
6-speed manual AWD
hills light light 20 50 0 30 60 11.7  
2006 4dr SUV 225-horsepower 3.0L I6
5-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat med light 21 14 31 34 75 12.3  
2005 4dr SUV 225-horsepower 3.0L I6
5-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat med light 5 47 12 36 70 14.1  
2005 4dr SUV 184-horsepower 2.5L I6
6-speed manual AWD
hills light light 44 0 0 56 60 10.5  
2005 4dr SUV 184-horsepower 2.5L I6
5-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat med none 16 13 13 59 115 11.9  
2004 4dr SUV 225-horsepower 3.0L I6
5-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat med hvy 2 9 27 62 73 11.5  
2004 4dr SUV 184-horsepower 2.5L I6
5-speed shiftable automatic AWD
hills light light 4 9 39 49 71 10.4  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the BMW X3 fuel economy data.

Mitsubishi Lancer vs. BMW X3 Fuel Economy (L/100km)

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Mitsubishi Lancer and BMW X3's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world L/100km based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans and Hatchbacks.
See TrueDelta's information for all Mitsubishi models and BMW models.

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Mitsubishi Lancer

Mitsubishi Lancer Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearComment
Mitsubishi did improve the powertrain's EPA ratings a few years ago. But they're still only 22 mpg city, 31 highway. Even the portly Dart GT manages 23/33 with a manual transmission. Credit a sixth ratio the Lancer lacks. In my suburban driving, the trip computer regularly reported averages in the high 20s. Other compacts have done better in the same driving, but not by as wide a margin as the EPA numbers would suggest. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Mitsubishi Lancer

Mitsubishi Lancer Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2011 4dr Sedan 148-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
I am getting consistent 27-29 MPG on mid-west (flat) back county roads during my commute. I am getting 32 MPG on the highway. My driving style is moderately spirited. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
Uses regular gas and gets about 30 mpg. My Civic SI was getting about the same but used premium. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
Very good millage/power ratio see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
The car gets average fuel economy in its class, coming in at about 22 mpg city, 30 mpg highway, but it is well above most cars. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
Mitsubishi Lancer Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
It's not as great as you'd expect from an econobox. If this is your biggest concern, this is not the car for you. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
17 mpg in 2.4 litter my altima that is 2.5 litter i get 23 same driving conditions hmm bigger engin better gas if it always worked out this way i would buy a bmw 335 xdrive see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2008 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
22-24 avarage MPG see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
 

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the BMW X3

BMW X3 Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearComment
2013 While the boosted four has a clear performance advantage, the swap was motivated primarily by the push for better fuel economy. EPA ratings are 21 mpg city, 28 highway, vs. the 2012 six's 19/25. An Audi Q5 comes close, 20/28, but with 211 horsepower isn't as strong. Despite weighing about 400 pounds less than the X3's 4,112, a Ford Escape with a similarly spec'd engine does no better. A Mercedes GLK350? 19/24. The Volvo is even worse. Compared to cars, the X3 doesn't fare as well. The roomier, nearly as heavy 528i rates 22/33. The crossover's larger frontal area and higher ground clearance take their toll as speed climbs. In our real-world sub-freezing suburban driving, the trip computer usually reported about 21 once the engine was warmed up, matching the EPA rating and quite good for a powerful, two-ton, all-wheel-drive vehicle. Engage an aggressive Eco Pro mode for a Prius-like throttle response and ultra-low rpm shifts, and mid-20s are easily achievable while high 20s are possible. I even observed 32 over one short trip where the lights were in my favor. But the cars behind you won't be happy. Conversely, enjoy the turbo at every opportunity and fuel economy will fall into the teens. A defeatable standard auto start/stop system operates a little more smoothly than in last year's 3-Series, but not as smoothly as it ought to. see full BMW X3 review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the BMW X3

BMW X3 Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2007 4dr SUV 260-horsepower 3.0L I6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
We get 22.5 mpg consistently in overall averaging and 26 to 27 on open road trips. see full BMW X3 review
BMW X3 Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2009 4dr SUV 260-horsepower 3.0L I6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
Have noticed as low as 10 mpg in start and stop city driving. Average for daily driving is 14 mpg. It uses premium fuel so driving this car is already very expensive. see full BMW X3 review
2006 4dr SUV 225-horsepower 3.0L I6
5-speed shiftable automatic AWD
City driving fuel economy is not bad for an SUV. I average around 16MPG battling heavy traffic and my need for “enjoying using the accelerator”. Highway mileage is not so great. Cruising at 70-80MPH returns around 22MPG. see full BMW X3 review